|
HS Code |
201677 |
| Chemical Name | Tris(2-phenylpyridine)iridium |
| Chemical Formula | C33H24IrN3 |
| Cas Number | 94928-86-6 |
| Molecular Weight | 708.76 g/mol |
| Appearance | yellow-green solid |
| Melting Point | 284-286 °C |
| Solubility | soluble in organic solvents such as chloroform and dichloromethane |
| Purity | typically >99% |
| Main Application | OLED emitter |
| Emission Maximum | around 520 nm |
| Coordination Geometry | octahedral |
| Iridium Oxidation State | +3 |
| Density | 1.56 g/cm³ |
| Synonyms | Ir(ppy)3 |
| Stability | stable under ambient conditions |
As an accredited Tris(2-phenylpyridine)iridium factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Tris(2-phenylpyridine)iridium, 1 gram, is supplied in a sealed amber glass vial with tamper-evident cap, labeled with hazard warnings. |
| Container Loading (20′ FCL) | Container Loading (20′ FCL): Typically packed in sealed drums or jars, totaling around 2,000–4,000 kg per 20′ full container load. |
| Shipping | Tris(2-phenylpyridine)iridium is shipped in a tightly sealed container under inert atmosphere, typically argon, to prevent degradation. Packaging ensures protection from moisture and light. It is handled according to hazardous materials regulations, with proper labeling and documentation. Temperature-controlled shipping may be used to maintain product stability during transit. |
| Storage | Tris(2-phenylpyridine)iridium should be stored in a tightly sealed container, protected from light and moisture, in a cool, dry, and well-ventilated area. It should be kept away from incompatible substances, such as strong oxidizing agents. Properly label the container, and handle the compound using appropriate personal protective equipment to avoid direct contact or inhalation of dust. |
| Shelf Life | **Shelf Life:** Tris(2-phenylpyridine)iridium is stable for at least two years when stored in a cool, dry, and dark place. |
|
Purity 99.9%: Tris(2-phenylpyridine)iridium with a purity of 99.9% is used in organic light-emitting diode (OLED) fabrication, where it ensures high luminous efficiency and device reliability. Stability temperature up to 300°C: Tris(2-phenylpyridine)iridium with stability temperature up to 300°C is used in high-temperature optoelectronic applications, where it maintains stable photoluminescent properties under thermal stress. Photoluminescence quantum yield >70%: Tris(2-phenylpyridine)iridium with a photoluminescence quantum yield greater than 70% is used in display panel manufacturing, where it enhances brightness and color purity. Melting point 276°C: Tris(2-phenylpyridine)iridium with a melting point of 276°C is used in thin-film deposition processes, where it allows for precise thermal evaporation and consistent film morphology. Particle size <5 µm: Tris(2-phenylpyridine)iridium with a particle size of less than 5 µm is used in inkjet printing of emissive layers, where it enables uniform layer deposition and improved pixel definition. Molecular weight 615.75 g/mol: Tris(2-phenylpyridine)iridium with a molecular weight of 615.75 g/mol is used in solution processing of emissive films, where it facilitates controlled solubility and processability. Solubility in chlorinated solvents: Tris(2-phenylpyridine)iridium with excellent solubility in chlorinated solvents is used in spin-coating techniques, where it ensures homogeneous coating and minimizes defect formation. Thermal stability over 200 hours: Tris(2-phenylpyridine)iridium with thermal stability over 200 hours is used in long-life OLED displays, where it contributes to prolonged device operational lifetimes. |
Competitive Tris(2-phenylpyridine)iridium prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615371019725 or mail to sales7@bouling-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: sales7@bouling-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Tris(2-phenylpyridine)iridium, better known in labs and workshops as Ir(ppy)3, deserves attention from anyone serious about OLED technology, organic electronics, and photonics. You come across this compound where performance and visual clarity run the show—like in high-grade displays and lighting solutions. My first time working with Ir(ppy)3, I was struck by its intense green emission under UV light, turning a routine synthesis bench into a light show. Status reports and scientific journals celebrate Ir(ppy)3 for that unmistakable phosphorescent green a lot of next-gen devices aim for. It becomes clear, pretty fast, why researchers and R&D teams gravitate to this iridium complex when other materials fade into the background.
Ir(ppy)3 doesn’t look particularly flashy in a powder jar—a pale yellow-green, somewhat unremarkable at first glance. Its true character appears once you get it into solution or a thin film. This molecule stacks three 2-phenylpyridine ligands around a central iridium ion, forming a rigid, highly conjugated structure. The result opens up that rare combination: stability under tough processing conditions, and strong luminescence at room temperature. The triplet emission can push external quantum efficiencies past what’s reachable with standard fluorescent dyes—think lighting up a whole screen with less power, and richer color.
In my own hands-on experience, handling Ir(ppy)3 requires a bit of respect. Unlike cheaper phosphorescent dyes or even older-generation platinum complexes, this iridium compound remains robust in glove boxes and fabrication lines. It doesn’t degrade easily in the presence of trace oxygen or under moderate thermal stress. I’ve watched synthesis teams run multiple evaporations with little purity loss. Purification—often carried out by repeated crystallization and column chromatography—yields material pure enough for sensitive device fabrication tasks, like forming the emission layer in OLED stacks.
No story about Tris(2-phenylpyridine)iridium would make sense without getting into organic light-emitting diodes. Years ago, when OLED displays first started competing with conventional LCDs, color purity and power consumption were bottlenecks. Ir(ppy)3 came into the scene and changed display characteristics. The compound’s triplet harvesting ability lets device makers use both singlet and triplet excitons. Conventional dyes only get the singlet part, which means there’s a 25% upper limit on internal quantum efficiency. Ir(ppy)3 drives that up to about 100% on paper and well over 90% in real-world devices.
From my time at a small display startup, integrating Ir(ppy)3 meant ditching thick, power-hungry backlights and moving to flexible, light, and efficient panels. The color range widens using Ir(ppy)3, making greens vivid—a reason why many flagship phones and high-end TVs employ it, sometimes blended with other phosphors to tune emission and balance the spectrum. It’s not just about visuals; efficiency boosts translate directly into longer battery life and less heat generation. For portable electronics, those are serious gains.
Many researchers and engineers cycle through multiple emitter molecules searching for the sweet spot between light output, process compatibility, and cost. Platinum-based emitters, for instance, held early promise, but they fell short in emission intensity and sometimes produced ambiguous hues. Simple organic fluorophores, by contrast, sold low cost and decent process compatibility, but failed to utilize triplet excitons. Ir(ppy)3 stands out because it tackles shortcomings head-on. Its structure grants strong spin–orbit coupling, which means phosphorescence occurs efficiently at room temperature, unlike most organic and some metal-organic candidates.
Ruthenium and osmium complexes appear sometimes in literature, offering various emission wavelengths, but few match iridium’s quantum yield or operational shelf-life in device architectures. CIE chromaticity coordinates with Ir(ppy)3 remain stable over tens of thousands of hours, even under harsh drive conditions. Compare this with trial runs using cheaper copper complexes, and degradation rates become a sore subject.
Laboratory performance doesn’t always translate seamlessly to manufacturing. Ir(ppy)3 is relatively expensive to produce due to the cost of iridium and the multi-step synthesis required. At first glance, this cost might seem like a barrier. In practice, a little goes a long way. The material’s high photoluminescence quantum yield means small amounts suffice for large-area devices. Supply chain hurdles—such as sourcing iridium or refining synthesis routes—deserve attention, particularly for companies scaling up production. This is something I’ve seen first-hand during procurement bottlenecks, where lab priorities needed to align with the realities of industrial-scale supply.
Environmental and safety concerns receive industry attention, too. Ir(ppy)3 is handled inside closed systems and under inert atmospheres in many labs, mainly because trace degradation products haven’t been fully studied in consumer settings. Iridium itself is far less abundant than platinum or copper, raising sustainability questions. Responsible sourcing and efficient recycling become meaningful topics for conversation as adoption ramps up. My colleagues and I advocate planned return and recovery programs for high-value electronic waste—the kind that lets valuable iridium cycles back into the material pipeline instead of vanishing into landfill.
Flat-panel displays account for most global Ir(ppy)3 usage. Smartphones and televisions benefit from the compound’s strong green emission, which aligns with human eye sensitivity. Yet, the real applications don’t stop here. In solid-state lighting, Ir(ppy)3 blends with red and blue phosphors to produce white light—sometimes boasting higher color rendering than many legacy technologies, and with less wasted energy as heat. Over the years, lighting manufacturers moved away from mercury vapor and fluorescent tubes, opting instead for OLED panels powered by phosphorescent iridium complexes.
Wearable electronics illustrate another point. LEDs built with Ir(ppy)3 operate at lower voltages, resist damage from flexing and folding, and maintain brightness despite repeated stress. You see these features echoed in health monitoring patches and futuristic smart clothing. In addition, high-sensitivity photodetectors and organic solar cells borrow some design principles from phosphorescent emitters—the efficient conversion between electrical energy and photons remains at the center of these advances, and Ir(ppy)3 brings unmatched reliability.
Research groups routinely publish emission spectra and lifetime curves for Ir(ppy)3. Data points show external quantum efficiencies exceeding 20% in optimized green OLED structures. Stability tests performed at major labs report operational lifetimes crossing 50,000 hours at standard brightness. One memorable conference involved demonstrations of OLED panels driven by Ir(ppy)3, which ran without perceptible luminance loss throughout days of continuous operation. This reliability matters to product engineers who know that warranty returns and support cases often hinge on a few percentage points of device degradation over time.
Academic work backs up the field performance. Groups at institutions like the University of Oxford and the University of Michigan provide ample peer-reviewed articles detailing synthesis tweaks, new ligand modifications, and device integration schemes. These technical advances push power conversion and light output further. For people like me, who interpret this data and pass it down the supply chain, confidence grows each time independent teams reproduce or exceed prior benchmarks.
In the lab or on the factory floor, Ir(ppy)3 takes some handling precautions, as with most transition-metal complexes. Moisture-sensitive by nature, it works best in controlled environments—glove boxes with dry nitrogen or argon atmospheres are preferred. Direct inhalation or skin contact isn't recommended. This isn’t a roadblock, just part of routine protocol for professionals who already deal with fine powders and chemical vapors. Proper storage under inert atmospheres or in airtight bottles on cold shelves preserves material stability.
Quality control means running regular NMR and mass spectrometry checks, something process engineers and analytical chemists already know as standard procedure. The consistency from reputable synthesis routes pays off with reproducible device performance. Layer-by-layer deposition—whether by vacuum evaporation or solution casting—lets engineers experiment with architectures tailored to specific product formats. In mobile devices, for example, micron-thin emissive layers translate to lighter, sleeker gadgets. For large-area installations, scalable solution-processing offers an edge over batch evaporation.
Electronic ink, stretchable displays, and next-gen photodetectors form a new frontier for Ir(ppy)3. Its triplet emission properties, while already proven in OLEDs, spur research into quantum information devices and energy upconversion systems. Groups pursuing room-temperature phosphorescence in organometallic frameworks often cite Ir(ppy)3 as the gold standard for benchmarking new compounds. My own experience tinkering with these emerging technologies suggests that lessons learned from Ir(ppy)3 integration—crystal formation, thin-film alignment, and interface optimization—transfer smoothly to other pioneering materials.
This isn’t theoretical speculation. A recent set of prototypes used Ir(ppy)3 within transparent electrodes to demonstrate bio-sensing patches that light up in response to specific biochemical triggers. The stable photoluminescence turns cheap optical readers into real-time medical monitors. In another context, photonic crystals and sensors employ Ir(ppy)3 to create sharp, detectable shifts in emission. This indicates broad value well beyond consumer displays, opening the door to low-cost diagnostics and environmental monitoring.
Cost remains an ever-present concern with iridium complexes, spurring ongoing innovation in recycling programs and alternative ligand design. Some startups and academic labs pursue hybrid materials, hoping to extend iridium’s high quantum efficiency into less precious core metals or novel architectures. So far, outright replacements lose ground on stability or emission intensity, but the pursuit itself improves industry standards.
In my own view, real progress will come from efficient collection and regeneration systems for used iridium complexes. Industrial actors have invested in recycling channels for platinum-group metals—adapted for compounds like Ir(ppy)3, similar strategies make long-term sustainability possible. Detailed tracking of recycled material purity and performance metrics, paired with clear labeling requirements, supports both environmental goals and end-user trust.
You don’t have to look far to see what sets Ir(ppy)3 apart. Generic organic emitters struggle to harness triplet emission, so they hit a performance ceiling. Cheaper copper- and zinc-based phosphorescent dyes occasionally show promise for entry-level devices, but with notable trade-offs in emission spectrum sharpness and lifetime. Platinum-group analogues present similar emission principles but can drift in hue or lose efficacy under normal device stress.
Unlike competitors, Ir(ppy)3 offers consistent, strong green photoluminescence, with emission peaks that align well with device optimization in green pixels—a critical channel in display color mixing. Lifetime measurements in commercial OLEDs put the iridium compound at the top for stability, helping manufacturers offer reliable, color-true displays that weather continuous daily use for years. In my direct experience, attempts to swap Ir(ppy)3 with bulkier or less coordinated ligands inevitably produce less robust devices—either the spectrum shifts off target or operational lifetimes plummet.
Environmental health experts have begun comparing the safety profiles of various phosphorescent emitters. Ir(ppy)3 sits in the “generally manageable” category, assuming industrial hygiene and correct disposal. Its flashpoint for photodecomposition sits higher than many other organic dyes. Long-term exposure studies remain incomplete, but standard best practices minimize risk at every stage—from synthesis lines to consumer end-of-life scenarios.
The successful adoption of Ir(ppy)3 in industry circles depends not just on technical power, but also on honest communication, documented results, and training of everyone in the supply and production line. People new to the material benefit from open-access papers and real data charts, which drive understanding and trust. I’ve seen newly trained staff catch potential mishandling issues faster with even a brief grounding in the compound’s reactivity and safety points. Device designers and chemists alike benefit from easy-to-read process documentation, which has improved over recent years thanks to collective experience.
Looking ahead, market forces and technical advancements steer Ir(ppy)3 toward faster, better, and more sustainable uses. Miniaturized displays, medical sensing, and wearable tech anchor the product in society’s most pressing needs—affordable, clear, and energy-smart electronics and lighting. Continued collaboration between manufacturers, recycling partners, and academic researchers sharpens each new generation of products. For anyone tracking the evolution of optoelectronics, Tris(2-phenylpyridine)iridium remains central in the discussion about what makes high-performance photonics possible, and how values like energy saving and responsible waste management turn theory into reality.