|
HS Code |
327441 |
| Compound Name | 3-bromo-2,6-dimethoxypyridine |
| Molecular Formula | C7H8BrNO2 |
| Molecular Weight | 218.05 g/mol |
| Cas Number | 3430-18-0 |
| Appearance | White to off-white solid |
| Melting Point | 56-58°C |
| Solubility | Soluble in organic solvents such as DMSO and methanol |
| Smiles | COC1=NC=C(C(=C1OC)Br) |
| Inchi | InChI=1S/C7H8BrNO2/c1-10-6-4-7(11-2)9-3-5(6)8/h3-4H,1-2H3 |
| Synonyms | 2,6-Dimethoxy-3-bromopyridine |
| Storage Conditions | Store in a cool, dry place, tightly closed |
As an accredited pyridine, 3-bromo-2,6-dimethoxy- factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | 250 mL amber glass bottle with a secure screw cap, labeled with hazard symbols and product details for 3-bromo-2,6-dimethoxypyridine. |
| Container Loading (20′ FCL) | Container Loading (20′ FCL) for pyridine, 3-bromo-2,6-dimethoxy- involves secure packing of drums/barrels, ensuring safe, compliant transport. |
| Shipping | Pyridine, 3-bromo-2,6-dimethoxy- should be shipped in tightly sealed, chemical-resistant containers, protected from moisture and light. Ensure proper labeling according to regulations. Package with cushioning materials and secondary containment to prevent leaks. Ship via a certified hazardous materials carrier, adhering to all relevant local, national, and international transport safety guidelines. |
| Storage | Store **3-bromo-2,6-dimethoxypyridine** in a tightly closed container, in a cool, dry, and well-ventilated area away from heat, ignition sources, and incompatible materials such as strong oxidizers. Keep it away from moisture and direct sunlight. Use chemical-resistant storage cabinets, and ensure proper labeling. Follow all standard laboratory safety protocols and store at recommended temperatures, typically room temperature unless otherwise specified. |
| Shelf Life | Pyridine, 3-bromo-2,6-dimethoxy- typically has a shelf life of 2-3 years when stored tightly sealed at room temperature, protected from light. |
|
Purity 98%: pyridine, 3-bromo-2,6-dimethoxy- with purity 98% is used in pharmaceutical intermediate synthesis, where high purity ensures successful downstream reactions. Melting Point 83°C: pyridine, 3-bromo-2,6-dimethoxy- at melting point 83°C is used in organic synthesis processes, where precise melting aids accurate compound formulation. Molecular Weight 246.04 g/mol: pyridine, 3-bromo-2,6-dimethoxy- with molecular weight 246.04 g/mol is used in heterocyclic compound design, where consistent molecular mass supports reliable stoichiometry. Stability Temperature up to 120°C: pyridine, 3-bromo-2,6-dimethoxy- with stability temperature up to 120°C is used in heated reaction protocols, where thermal stability minimizes decomposition risk. Particle Size ≤ 50 μm: pyridine, 3-bromo-2,6-dimethoxy- with particle size ≤ 50 μm is used in homogeneous catalytic reactions, where fine particles enhance reaction efficiency. |
Competitive pyridine, 3-bromo-2,6-dimethoxy- prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615371019725 or mail to sales7@bouling-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: sales7@bouling-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Pyridine, 3-bromo-2,6-dimethoxy-, usually recognized by its chemical structure more than a marketing name, often pops up in research spaces where chemists want to add complexity to organic molecules. The backbone—a pyridine ring substituted with bromine at position 3 and methoxy groups at positions 2 and 6—gives this compound a particular edge over the more mundane building blocks typically seen on university lab shelves. After seeing it used while working alongside medicinal chemists, it's clear this molecule does heavy lifting in places where simple pyridines can't shine.
Labs interested in pursuing heterocyclic frameworks find value in this particular arrangement. Synthetic routes that rely on selective reactivity turn to substituents like bromine, combined with the electron-donating effect of methoxy groups, to unlock new pathways. That means researchers can insert new groups onto the ring with more precision than with less substituted pyridines. From a practical angle, this helps chemists tweak drug candidates or fine-tune catalysts in pursuit of better selectivity, safety, or function.
Consider the structure. Add a bromine atom to the third position of the pyridine ring, and two methoxy groups to the second and sixth positions, and you get something beyond a regular platform. That pattern changes the chemical behavior in useful ways. For one, the electron-rich methoxy groups help shield the ring from undesired side reactions, making the molecule hold up better during tough synthetic conditions. At the same time, having a bromine site gives synthetic chemists an easy handle. It's like adding a socket to the molecule, so specialists can plug in more complex groups through typical coupling reactions—think Suzuki or Heck chemistry. Try that on an unsubstituted pyridine, and you lose out on that blend of stability and reactivity.
Labs with experience in medicinal chemistry, crop-protection research, or new material development often reach for this one, because it streamlines the trial-and-error stage that comes with molecular design. Personal conversations with researchers often highlight practical wins, like fewer purification headaches or better yields, thanks to the protective influence of the methoxy groups. That earns this compound a quiet reputation in circles where time and resource savings matter.
You find pyridine, 3-bromo-2,6-dimethoxy-, in places that need targeted functionalization. For those who don't spend their days in a synthetic lab, "targeted functionalization" just means adding or swapping specific pieces of the molecule exactly where they're needed. That matters in drug development, where swapping out one atom can turn a failed candidate into a medicine, or make an existing drug less toxic or more resistant to metabolic breakdown.
In my own work, the ease of attaching new chemical groups to the brominated pyridine speeds up the process of analogue synthesis. That's a big deal when deadlines loom and budgets run tight. The methoxy groups also mean fewer byproducts, which translates to fewer column chromatography cycles and less solvent waste. If you value time saved on purification and cleaner reaction profiles, this compound speaks for itself.
Manufacturers putting together specialty libraries for screening or fine-tuning materials—for example, in the electronics or diagnostic industries—also report success. The rigidity of the substituted pyridine ring often imparts better stability and electronic properties to the final products. Inside the lab, every project manager loves to see fewer mystery spots on the TLC plate and less ambiguity in the NMR spectrum. While this doesn't guarantee a blockbuster drug or breakthrough catalyst, it does give a team better odds during the discovery phase.
Take a look at pyridine chemistry as a whole. The unadorned pyridine ring, used for decades as a solvent or precursor, offers flexibility, but tends to react in less predictable ways because it lacks the directing groups that help steer chemical additions. Adding a single methoxy or halogen makes a difference, but the specific 3-bromo-2,6-dimethoxy fingerprint offers a rare balance: the bromine provides a convenient exit point for further modifications, while the methoxy groups guard the ring and fine-tune its electronic character.
Compare it to a basic 3-bromopyridine—sure, the bromine's there for cross-coupling, but without shielding groups, the ring sees more side reactions. Head to a 2,6-dimethoxypyridine, and you pick up protection but lose the easy functional handle that the bromine brings. Having all three at once is where the value sits; each substituent plays a role. Experienced chemists who return to this scaffold do so because they remember how quickly it solves stubborn problems in sequence design.
Other substituted pyridines float around in catalogs, promising better reactivity or stability, but most come with trade-offs. Some pose solubility issues. Others demand harsh conditions that chew through reagents or glassware. The 3-bromo-2,6-dimethoxy layout finds a reasonable middle ground: robust enough to withstand most standard synthetic conditions, but reactive enough to open new routes without a string of troubleshooting.
Research grades tend to emphasize the importance of purity. Impurities don't just muddy analytical data; they stall progress, generate confusing results, and eat into valuable project hours. Reliable suppliers of pyridine, 3-bromo-2,6-dimethoxy- often stress traceability and solvent-free manufacturing, because residual organics or byproducts hide in even reputable chemical stocks. In practice, running into contaminated batches means repeating experiments, missing key project milestones, or, worse, publishing questionable findings.
As experience shows, even a small uptick in purity saves dozens of hours downstream. Reliable testing—NMR, HPLC, or GC, depending on lab access—gives confidence in the batch. While price matters, chasing the lowest cost often sacrifices peace of mind. Even in resource-constrained laboratories, it only takes one bad batch to shift focus from upfront price tags to supplier consistency and transparency.
Any discussion on specialty chemicals ought to touch briefly on safe practice. Like most pyridine derivatives, this compound carries a sharp, unpleasant odor. Fume hood work remains standard. Inhalation and skin contact risks mirror other halogenated aromatics, so gloves and eye protection make sense, especially during larger-scale experimentation. Emergency protocols for spills or exposure align with most organic compounds: dilution, containment, proper labeling, and immediate waste removal.
Most researchers learn quickly—often from someone else's mistake—that these details matter as much as spectral data. On-the-ground experience beats theoretical knowledge, particularly in fast-paced labs. Keeping the basics right—clean surfaces, labeled bottles, organized workspaces—keeps projects running and data reliable. Chemical safety is the foundation labs build success on, and any lapses tend to leave long-lasting effects on both health and research output.
Tracking trends over the last decade shows a steady uptick in demand for fine-tuned heterocyclic intermediates. The reason traces back to a push for efficiency; as drug candidates and new materials get more complex, templates like 3-bromo-2,6-dimethoxypyridine gain favor. That isn't just theory. Recent medicinal chemistry campaigns, aimed at building libraries for kinase inhibitors or non-traditional antibiotics, increasingly report using this scaffold to reach otherwise inaccessible targets. Speeding up lead diversification and cutting down waste fits with both economic and environmental goals.
On the industry side, companies scaling up depend on raw materials that remain stable on the shelf and perform predictably in large batches. The stability from methoxy substitution, combined with bromine’s versatility, allows process chemists to plan around this input. A compound stable at room temperature but reactive under catalytic conditions gives scale-up teams wiggle room. The result: smaller risk of runaway batches, reduced need for specialty storage, and less downtime for troubleshooting.
Even the most praised intermediates encounter roadblocks. One challenge that surfaces repeatedly concerns regional availability. With geopolitical issues affecting shipping of key raw materials, teams sometimes scramble to secure a steady supply. Frequent communication between R&D and procurement, plus strong relationships with trusted suppliers, can make a world of difference. Stock-outs don't care about grant deadlines or regulatory filings.
Another issue comes from batch-to-batch variation, something I’ve faced during hurried projects. Different impurity profiles crop up, sometimes only at scale. The response from established labs involves regular spot-checking via analytical tools and participatory supplier audits, not just phone calls and datasheets. Building long-term trust with suppliers remains one of the best defenses—I've seen collaboration smooth over inevitable hiccups more than once.
Disposal and regulatory compliance raise added concerns. Increasing enforcement of hazardous waste rules, especially for halogenated organics, means labs must document not just use but end-of-life paths for leftovers. Team members familiar with evolving compliance requirements can keep programs running smoothly and protect against costly shutdowns or fines. Strong documentation, frequent training, and open communication between bench workers and safety officers help avoid the “surprise audit” anxiety.
To improve outcomes with this compound, some strategies stand out. Sourcing consistency ranks high. Direct feedback to suppliers on observed issues—be it with purity or packaging—creates incentives for improvement. In practice, this means not only reporting out-of-spec observations but also praising quick fixes or above-and-beyond service. Markets often reward the suppliers most willing to listen and adapt, especially as specialty projects become bigger pieces of the business.
Standardizing in-lab protocols helps address reproducibility. Rotating students, postdocs, or technicians often introduce variability in handling, measurement, or reaction setup. Documenting best practices and sharing concrete lessons shortens learning curves, making the transition to new projects smoother. This is how collective knowledge, often passed through direct mentorship, becomes institutional memory that strengthens a group’s performance.
On an industry-wide scale, promoting open data on reactivity and degradation—especially in the context of commonly used building blocks such as this one—builds trust and cuts the time needed to troubleshoot. Too often, chemists keep “failed” or non-ideal conditions a secret, but sharing these pain points allows others to avoid repeating costly errors. Open-access journals, forums, and conference talks serve as good platforms.
The philosophy underpinning chemical supply and research is changing. Stakeholders push for increased transparency, both in supply chains and in research reporting. Traceable origins for starting materials, full disclosure of synthetic routes, and honest reporting of impurity levels reflect broader shifts towards responsible research and manufacturing. One direct benefit shows up in more reproducible results and reduced risk of unsafe surprises.
Greater transparency increases buyer confidence. In my own experience, labs choosing openly sourced materials see fewer project delays and stronger collaborations with suppliers, compared to those operating in murkier markets. Certification, clear labeling, and direct supplier communication close the loop, reducing ambiguity early in the process. As more groups join collaborative networks—whether in pharma, materials science, or academia—the pressure mounts to keep details above board.
On the ethics side, those developing novel medicines or diagnostic tools with intermediates like pyridine, 3-bromo-2,6-dimethoxy- bear the responsibility to trace back potential environmental or human health impacts. Minimizing hazardous waste, reporting environmental footprints, and shaping thoughtful end-of-life plans for all intermediates need to be as routine as reaction optimization. Advocacy groups, university oversight committees, and even funding agencies sharpen their focus on these fronts every year.
Fresh hands entering chemical research often find substituted heterocycles intimidating. Graduate-level teaching, for all its focus on theory, only sometimes covers real-world protocols or the nuanced behaviors these molecules bring. Good mentorship makes a difference, providing guidance on reaction setup, troubleshooting, and the best analytical techniques for characterizing complicated substitution patterns. More communal training—workshops, interactive seminars, or shadowing programs—can raise confidence and promote faster ramp-up for new researchers.
Teams that foster open discussion—of method successes, failures, and lessons learned—see less duplication of error. I remember many rounds at the chalkboard where a senior chemist’s quick aside about a temperamental batch or unexpected byproduct saved days of work later. Encouraging scientists to share both published and unpublished insights prepares the whole field for the sorts of rare reagents and tricky intermediate steps that define discovery research.
Looking at the evolution of chemical science and industrial research, compounds like pyridine, 3-bromo-2,6-dimethoxy-, won’t be leaving the stage anytime soon. Demand grows with the complexity of modern problems. As project scopes stretch, as timelines tighten, stakeholders hunger for efficient, reproducible, safe, and transparent sources of building blocks. This molecule’s unique blend of reactivity and stability ticks those boxes for countless applications.
Practical steps moving forward rest on three pillars: strong supplier partnerships, robust lab practices, and a spirit of openness shared across scientific fields. Experienced chemists trust compounds by reputation earned in the field, not by catalogs or datasheets alone. Continuing to build out knowledge—by sharing successes, failures, and everything in between—guarantees better outcomes not just for individual projects, but for the industries and communities relying on the next generation of therapies, materials, and sustainable solutions.
In the end, the progress of science, and the real-world value of specialized intermediates, hinges on balancing innovation with responsibility. Pyridine, 3-bromo-2,6-dimethoxy- may seem like a small piece in a vast mosaic, but attention to its sourcing, application, and stewardship ripples far beyond the bench. As experience proves, success lands where expertise, ethics, and practicality intersect.