|
HS Code |
216719 |
| Chemical Name | Pyridine, 2,3-dibromo-5-fluoro- |
| Molecular Formula | C5H2Br2FN |
| Molecular Weight | 269.88 g/mol |
| Cas Number | 863504-36-7 |
| Iupac Name | 2,3-dibromo-5-fluoropyridine |
| Appearance | Solid, typically off-white to light brown |
| Melting Point | 53-56 °C |
| Density | Approx. 2.1 g/cm³ (estimated) |
| Solubility In Water | Low |
| Smiles | C1=CC(=NC(=C1Br)Br)F |
| Inchi | InChI=1S/C5H2Br2FN/c6-3-1-5(8)9-2-4(3)7 |
| Other Names | 2,3-Dibromo-5-fluoropyridine |
As an accredited Pyridine, 2,3-dibromo-5-fluoro- factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Amber glass bottle containing 25 grams of Pyridine, 2,3-dibromo-5-fluoro-, sealed with a secure, chemical-resistant cap and labeled. |
| Container Loading (20′ FCL) | 20′ FCL container loading: 160 drums (200 kg each), totaling 32,000 kg, with sealed packaging for Pyridine, 2,3-dibromo-5-fluoro-. |
| Shipping | **Shipping Description:** Pyridine, 2,3-dibromo-5-fluoro- is shipped in tightly sealed containers, protected from light, moisture, and incompatible substances. It is classified as hazardous and must be handled according to regulations for toxic and potentially corrosive chemicals. Ensure labeling complies with international transport guidelines, including UN number and hazard class if applicable. |
| Storage | **Pyridine, 2,3-dibromo-5-fluoro-** should be stored in a tightly sealed container, in a cool, dry, and well-ventilated area away from sources of ignition and incompatible substances such as strong oxidizers and acids. Protect the chemical from moisture, direct sunlight, and excessive heat. Ensure proper labeling, and store at a temperature recommended by the manufacturer, typically at or below room temperature. |
| Shelf Life | Shelf life of Pyridine, 2,3-dibromo-5-fluoro- is typically 2-3 years if stored properly in a cool, dry place. |
|
Purity 98%: Pyridine, 2,3-dibromo-5-fluoro- with purity 98% is used in pharmaceutical intermediate synthesis, where it ensures high reaction yield and minimal by-product formation. Melting Point 80-83°C: Pyridine, 2,3-dibromo-5-fluoro- with a melting point of 80-83°C is used in agrochemical active ingredient development, where it provides thermal stability during formulation processes. Molecular Weight 257.89 g/mol: Pyridine, 2,3-dibromo-5-fluoro- at a molecular weight of 257.89 g/mol is used in heterocyclic compound research, where it facilitates precise stoichiometric calculations in synthetic pathways. Stability Temperature up to 120°C: Pyridine, 2,3-dibromo-5-fluoro- stable up to 120°C is used in high-temperature organic reactions, where it maintains chemical integrity under process conditions. Particle Size <10 µm: Pyridine, 2,3-dibromo-5-fluoro- with a particle size below 10 µm is used in fine chemical formulations, where it enables uniform dispersion and enhances reactivity. Reagent Grade: Pyridine, 2,3-dibromo-5-fluoro- at reagent grade is used in analytical method development, where it guarantees reproducibility and accuracy in quantitative analyses. Moisture Content <0.5%: Pyridine, 2,3-dibromo-5-fluoro- with moisture content below 0.5% is used in moisture-sensitive organic synthesis, where it reduces hydrolysis risk and ensures product consistency. Storage at 2-8°C: Pyridine, 2,3-dibromo-5-fluoro- stored at 2-8°C is used in laboratory sample archiving, where it preserves compound stability over extended periods. |
Competitive Pyridine, 2,3-dibromo-5-fluoro- prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615371019725 or mail to sales7@boxa-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: sales7@boxa-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Every few years, a unique molecule steps into the spotlight, attracting the attention of both researchers and industry chemists. Pyridine, 2,3-dibromo-5-fluoro-, known to many as a high-value intermediate, is one such compound. Its structure—pyridine core, bromines on the 2 and 3 positions, and fluorine at the 5-position—packs quite a punch in custom synthesis. Having navigated my way through more catalogs and sample vials than I dare admit, I’ve watched the focus on fine-tuned heterocyclic compounds, like this one, grow stronger in both pharmaceutical and agrochemical labs.
Unlike basic pyridine, the rings decorated with halogens at multiple points become something else entirely. The 2,3-dibromo-5-fluoro arrangement isn’t there for show—it sets up the molecule for functions you’ll never get from unsubstituted or mono-substituted pyridines. Those twin bromines act as both gatekeepers and launchpads, with the fluorine at the 5-position tweaking everything from electron density to final stability. In practical terms, chemists get a starting block for complex target molecules, with the added benefit of reactivity control—especially useful when building up sterically demanding frameworks or introducing functionalities that just won’t stick to simpler pyridine derivatives.
Look at the molecule’s blueprint: a six-membered nitrogen-containing core, with bromines crowding near the nitrogen’s influence, and a lone fluorine marking its distinct point. At the bench, this translates to a tool for making regioselective couplings much less guesswork-heavy. I remember time wasted trying to force a halogen swap on an ordinary pyridine; it turned out so frustrating that I swore off short-cuts for good. With a dihalogenated and fluorinated scaffold such as this, Suzuki, Sonogashira, and Heck reactions finally move along much more cleanly—bonding targets go exactly where you want them, no need to fight the molecule’s will. Yields climb, purification becomes straightforward, and the all-too-familiar ‘where did the mass go?’ question fades into the background.
Pyridine, 2,3-dibromo-5-fluoro- typically arrives as a crystalline powder. Researchers will recognize its sharp melting point, characteristic odor, and reliable storage properties—a combination that spares you from runaway degradation and accidental loss. With a molecular weight sitting around 273.89 g/mol, it holds a handy place the toolkit for mid-sized transformations. Purity rates above 98% are common with reputable sources; anything less risks introducing unwanted side reactions and muddy chromatograms, so it’s worth being selective about where it comes from. Most reputable suppliers offer certificates of analysis with trace impurity data, allowing a quick assessment whether the lot can handle more demanding syntheses.
Research chemists who lean on innovation often need more than textbook chemicals. That’s where this molecule shines. In a process development lab, switching from a plain pyridine to a halogenated, fluorinated analog lets you reach for newer, more selective targets—especially for those chasing proprietary active pharmaceutical ingredients. Introducing both bromine and fluorine not only changes metabolic fate but can open paths to bioisosteric replacements, which means new patentable space for the same lead scaffold. I’ve seen teams turn to this compound when they hit a wall synthesizing candidate molecules with improved metabolic profiles or those showing resistance to oxidative degradation.
Outside pharma, synthetic routes involving energetic materials or photoactive compounds also benefit. The halogen-fluorine recipe brings both reactivity and stability to the table. The fluorine atom, small but fierce, can dramatically adjust a molecule’s interaction with biological receptors, solvents, or even light. Some agricultural screens for crop protection agents use just this type of multi-halogen pyridine as a stepping stone toward higher potency or selectivity in their field trials.
Most pyridine derivatives offer a tradeoff: install enough halogens and you gain reactivity, but often at the expense of solubility or bench stability. Here, the placement of each substituent offers genuine advantages without the usual headaches. Many researchers learn the hard way that too much bromination leads to unworkable solids, and mono-fluorination only makes small tweaks. With both elements at chosen sites, you get a molecule that serves as an anchor point—no more trading away stability just to gain one more reaction handle.
In my own runs, the difference becomes clear during reaction setup. Control reactions using 2-bromo-pyridine or 3-bromo-pyridine often fail to mimic the behavior seen with the dibromo-fluoro arrangement. The unique electronic push-pull within this scaffold alters its activation energy, often allowing milder conditions, saving everyone from battling those dreaded purification bottlenecks or needing to start the synthesis all over. Recrystallization no longer turns into a guessing game; the defined structure and low impurity content mean there’s far less bleeding of intermediates into undesired products.
Pyridine derivatives, especially those stacked with halogens, present their own handling quirks. Exposure to skin or inhalation brings the usual safety considerations in most organic chemistry labs, but the heavier halogen load adds the need for good fume hoods and prompt cleanup. I learned early: run your protocols by the MSDS and stick to small-scale trials before scaling up. The environmental footprint gets attention, especially in waste disposal. Brominated organics don’t break down easily, meaning proper segregation and professional handling of lab residues matter more than ever—the same story repeated in every lab safety training session.
I’ve seen regulatory standards tightening on waste with polyhalogenated organics. Disposal costs rising, rules changing, and suppliers adapting with greener alternatives for packaging and solvents. The molecular structure makes incineration a preferred disposal route, often coordinated with certified waste contractors. For those running batch syntheses at pilot scale, planning ahead for the entire waste life cycle isn’t just responsible, it’s forced by law in most regions.
Over the last decade, demand for specialty pyridines has grown, spurred largely by trends in drug discovery and new crop protection targets. Market scarcity can push up prices and slow projects waiting on a single intermediate. Several years ago, I found myself scanning supplier lead times that had doubled due to global shortages of precursor halides. This made me realize how interlinked the industry has become; disruptions in one raw material cascade down to final availability. For anyone planning multi-step campaigns, this means forward-thinking purchasing and flexibility to change routes if critical reagents are slow to arrive.
Production has concentrated in regions with established chemical industries, particularly those able to handle halogen chemistry at scale. Though the supply lines have recovered, anyone running time-sensitive projects benefits from keeping a backup distributor. More labs are seeking out partners who offer transparent supply chain tracking, tighter batch documentation, and industry certifications—measures that speak directly to Google’s E-E-A-T focus on trust and experience. My own purchasing strategy shifted toward those who provided not just the compound, but reliable support, complete certifications, and clear traceability.
Having worked on process optimization teams, I’ve seen how this compound shortens timelines for synthesizing key intermediates. In some custom projects, moving from a tedious five-step process to a cleaner three steps led directly to savings—both in material and time. The selectivity granted by the 2,3-dibromo-5-fluoro setup allows smoother coupling reactions for aryl or heteroaryl partners, something that is often a nightmare with less heavily substituted pyridines.
Pharmaceutical teams like to use it when designing kinase inhibitors or allosteric modulators. The electron-withdrawing bromines, working together with fluorine, dial down unwanted metabolic pathways and let medicinal chemists tune the molecules for target engagement. For medicinal chemists, nothing beats achieving potency alongside slower metabolism, especially when regulatory agencies push hard for better safety profiles.
In agrochemical discovery, this scaffold’s rigidity helps in designing molecules that bind more tightly to their intended target. Many new-generation herbicides trace their early development to pyridine-based intermediates. Chemists in these sectors value molecules that lend themselves to a variety of substitutions; flexible chemistry translates to more candidates and a higher chance of success in notoriously unpredictable biological screens.
Reliance on heavily halogenated intermediates has a price. The environmental persistence of brominated and fluorinated organics worries both regulators and the scientific community. Environmental chemists and toxicologists raise alarms regarding downstream metabolites, many of which remain detectable for years. Anyone invested in sustainability faces the tension between needing these tools for practical chemistry and wanting cleaner, safer solutions. Sustainable processes for handling, recycling, or replacing halogen-heavy intermediates haven’t caught up with research demand. That tension isn’t theoretical—it hits every time the lab puts in a hazardous waste pickup request.
The health and safety teams in mid-sized and large organizations are not just checking boxes—they are looking for better alternatives, safer lab ventilation, and new training for handling halogenated materials. From my own work with junior chemists, I know it’s easy to underestimate the hazards from compounds that look routine on paper but hide serious risk in practice. Hands-on mentoring and case studies become essential, passing along real stories of minor incidents to make new chemists aware. The best-run operations keep the conversation going, turning compliance from a chore into a habit.
Researchers often ask, “Can we find greener or less hazardous substitutes?” In some cases, the answer is yes—by designing pathways that use non-halogenated intermediates, or tapping into emerging biocatalytic strategies. Alkene or nitro substitutions have shown promise, but they rarely match the precise activation profile the bromine-fluorine combination delivers. Some teams experiment with newer cross-coupling technologies that sidestep halogen-based activation, using boronic acids or non-traditional organometallics instead. That said, the pace of real replacement remains slow, especially in areas where regulatory approval depends on legacy chemistry.
Collaboration across research groups stands out as one way to drive change. Sharing successful case studies on swapping out hazardous intermediates, or pooling resources to develop greener protocols, builds momentum. During a past industry roundtable, I witnessed open exchanges about transitioning away from brominated scaffolds while keeping efficiency high. It’s encouraging, but the road to wide-scale adoption of alternatives will be gradual until greener protocols can match the performance and reliability that halogen-heavy pyridines deliver.
The solution isn’t extreme one way or the other. For now, the best path sits in a balanced approach—adopt stringent safe handling practices, reduce waste at the source, and stay informed about regulatory shifts. At the operational level, this often means investing in proper ventilation, double-layered gloves, and consistent training refreshes. I’ve seen labs move toward smaller batch sizes and in-situ generation of reactive intermediates, cutting not just costs, but the sheer volume of hazardous waste.
At the research planning stage, careful mapping of every step’s input and output pays off. Start with green chemistry principles—look for places to merge steps, minimize use of harsh solvents, and plan for recovery of unused material. With robust process design and stringent waste tracking, the compound becomes as safe as possible to wield, making the most of what it offers without causing unnecessary environmental strain.
Some in the scientific community argue that without molecules like pyridine, 2,3-dibromo-5-fluoro-, entire streams of innovation slow down. Synthesizing rare actives, generating new leads for drug development, or building novel agrochemical backbones relies heavily on powerful intermediates that can do more than just participate—they shape the entire trajectory of projects.
Within my own projects, these tools have broken deadlocks in synthetic routes or enabled the leap to candidates with better safety or bioavailability profiles. For graduate students or early-career chemists, understanding the “why” behind such molecules—why they’re valuable, where the risk lies, and how to use them responsibly—turns a commodity chemical into a practical instrument for progress.
Factories aren’t shutting down their halogenation units just yet, and academic labs are not walking away from these workhorses. Manufacturing trends suggest that as demand for targeted specialty chemicals keeps rising, fine-tuning purity, improving lot-to-lot consistency, and tightening downstream controls will become table stakes for producers.
On the lab floor, the search for balance continues. Researchers weigh the raw power of established intermediates against rising expectations for safety and sustainability. Programs now teach students how to spot and manage risks, not to shy away from challenging chemistry but to approach it with the informed respect it deserves. Whether the next breakthrough in drug discovery or crop protection comes from this exact molecule or one inspired by its architecture, progress rests on the willingness to improve both chemistry and stewardship side by side.