|
HS Code |
593380 |
| Iupac Name | ethyl imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-6-carboxylate |
| Cas Number | 142137-99-5 |
| Molecular Formula | C10H10N2O2 |
| Molecular Weight | 190.20 |
| Appearance | white to off-white solid |
| Melting Point | 95-98°C |
| Solubility | Slightly soluble in water, soluble in common organic solvents |
| Smiles | CCOC(=O)C1=CN2C=NC=CC2=C1 |
| Inchi | InChI=1S/C10H10N2O2/c1-2-14-10(13)8-5-7-12-6-3-4-9(12)11-7/h3-6H,2H2,1H3 |
| Storage Conditions | Store in a cool, dry place, tightly closed container |
As an accredited Imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-6-carboxylic acid ethyl ester factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | The packaging is a sealed amber glass bottle containing 25 grams of Imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-6-carboxylic acid ethyl ester, labeled with safety information. |
| Container Loading (20′ FCL) | 20′ FCL container loading for Imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-6-carboxylic acid ethyl ester ensures secure, efficient bulk chemical shipment. |
| Shipping | Imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-6-carboxylic acid ethyl ester is shipped in tightly sealed, chemical-resistant containers to prevent contamination and moisture exposure. The package is appropriately labeled, handled as a laboratory chemical, and typically shipped via ground or air, following all relevant regulations for transport of potentially hazardous organic compounds. |
| Storage | Store Imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-6-carboxylic acid ethyl ester in a tightly sealed container, protected from light, moisture, and incompatible substances. Keep in a cool, dry, and well-ventilated area, preferably at 2–8°C (refrigerator temperature). Ensure the storage area is clearly labeled, free from sources of ignition, and accessible only to trained personnel. Follow all relevant chemical safety guidelines. |
| Shelf Life | Imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-6-carboxylic acid ethyl ester typically has a shelf life of 2–3 years when stored in a cool, dry place. |
|
Purity 98%: Imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-6-carboxylic acid ethyl ester with purity 98% is used in pharmaceutical intermediate synthesis, where it ensures high yield and minimal byproduct formation. Melting point 158°C: Imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-6-carboxylic acid ethyl ester with a melting point of 158°C is used in organic compound formulation, where it offers thermal stability during processing. Low water content (<0.5%): Imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-6-carboxylic acid ethyl ester with low water content (<0.5%) is used in solid-state drug development, where it reduces the risk of hydrolytic degradation. Molecular weight 202.21 g/mol: Imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-6-carboxylic acid ethyl ester with molecular weight 202.21 g/mol is used in reference standards preparation, where it enables precise analytical quantification. Stability at 25°C: Imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-6-carboxylic acid ethyl ester with stability at 25°C is used in medicinal chemistry libraries, where it supports long-term compound storage without decomposition. Particle size < 50 μm: Imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-6-carboxylic acid ethyl ester with particle size < 50 μm is used in tablet formulation, where it promotes uniform blending and consistent dosage accuracy. Assay ≥99% (HPLC): Imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-6-carboxylic acid ethyl ester with assay ≥99% (HPLC) is used in fine chemical manufacturing, where it delivers consistent batch quality for downstream reactions. |
Competitive Imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-6-carboxylic acid ethyl ester prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615371019725 or mail to sales7@boxa-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: sales7@boxa-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Inside our factories, Imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-6-carboxylic acid ethyl ester often marks a line between simple molecular building blocks and more nuanced chemical innovation. Our experience with synthesizing heterocyclic compounds like this one stretches back years, and plenty of new applications for the imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine family have emerged in both pharmaceutical and agrochemical development. This particular derivative—distinguished by the ethyl ester functionality—has proven more versatile than older analogs and simpler esters.
The chemical formula—C10H10N2O2—reflects a careful design based on years of iterative feedback from industrial chemists and researchers. Unlike basic heterocycles, this compound couples reactivity at the imidazopyridine quaternary position with the steric and electronic characteristics of an ethyl ester group, offering options for both nucleophilic and electrophilic transformations. Running parallel to benzene chemistry, our ongoing process improvements focus on purity and control of isomer content, both of which shape the downstream synthetic reliability for our users.
Many routes for synthesizing imidazopyridines look similar on the surface, but minor byproduct formation and incomplete reactions create quality issues far down the value chain. We keep tight control not just at the final distillation and crystallization stages, but back into feedstock selection and process timing. Even small changes in residence time or catalyst load can introduce impurities that interfere with downstream functionalizations, so process monitoring does not stop at the batch’s final hour. Over time, these steps have reduced complaints about off-color or persistent odor stemming from uncontrolled side products or residual solvents.
Most end users—particularly in pharma and specialty chemicals—expect HPLC purities above 98%. We meet these expectations not by running short analytical programs, but by maintaining batch retention samples and running accelerated stability profiles for each lot. Spot-checking for residual solvents and checking melting points against our historical library gives us confidence the product will hold up in exacting synthesis environments. We see these requirements reflected in repeat orders and feedback; many customers have moved away from distributors where inconsistent batches disrupted their process scale-up.
At first glance, imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-6-carboxylic acid ethyl ester might get grouped with generic heterocyclic esters, but several physical and chemical properties clearly set it apart. The ethyl ester, compared to the methyl or t-butyl analogs, finds a sweet spot between reactivity and stability. Methyl esters sometimes hydrolyze too easily under basic or acidic conditions, complicating long synthetic routes with frequent purification steps. T-butyl esters force higher temperatures and harsher conditions for deprotection, risking degradation of sensitive linker groups elsewhere in the molecule. Our product, with its ethyl group, allows a predictable de-esterification profile—ideal for scale-ups and process transfers where batch-to-batch reproducibility matters.
The imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine scaffold itself displays strong electron delocalization, providing more robust handling under oxidative or reductive conditions than simpler bicyclic cores. During numerous customer trials, we observed that electrophilic aromatic substitutions proceed more selectively on this core compared to more activated imidazole-only systems. This helps medicinal chemists expand their structure-activity relationship studies without running into excess byproduct formation—savings which ripple through the rest of their programs.
On the floor, we field regular requests from teams moving from early-stage discovery into scale-up. They look for reliable, scalable routes using commercially available starting materials. Imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-6-carboxylic acid ethyl ester checked those boxes in several pharmaceutical companies’ kinase inhibitor projects. During pilot campaigns, teams appreciate its clean NMR and LCMS trace; no lingering solvents or non-volatile residues, so fewer process irritations. In combinatorial chemistry, our batches integrate smoothly into automated workflows, as the ethyl ester gives a manageable volatility profile that bootstraps library expansion. Technicians have told us the lower freezing point keeps lines running longer between cleanouts.
Across process chemistry and early research alike, users value how little fuss the compound presents during purification. Crystallization, extraction, and column chromatography steps often take less time, with sharp endpoints visible by TLC and UV, thanks to the core’s strong chromophore. Unlike many comparable fused heterocycles, this derivative readily forms manageable solids, not sticky oils or hygroscopic clumps, which suits automated solid transfer systems.
We also partner with agrochemical innovators exploring new herbicide leads, where metabolic stability in non-human mammals becomes critical. The ethyl ester features a balance between absorption efficiency and metabolic susceptibility, letting biologists trace analog fate without introducing toxic artifacts common to other, bulkier esters. Trial feedback pointed to this property as a significant win, with several follow-on orders confirming its role as a go-to building block for their next-generation crop protection compounds.
During synthesis development, chemists occasionally ask why not start from imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-6-carboxylic acid itself or even the corresponding nitrile or chloride. Our manufacturing data confirm the acid can suffer from poor solubility and can cause stickiness during isolation, requiring repeated trituration steps. Side reactions involving carboxylic acids—like decarboxylation or salt formation with bases in downstream transformations—result in variable yields and more rework during process cleanup. The ethyl ester skips these issues, allowing for smooth, predictable conversions such as hydrolysis to the acid, followed by amide coupling or other downstream functionalizations without material losses.
Comparing to the nitrile derivative, we notice users often face longer conversion times and increased risk of contaminating side products like amidines or imines, particularly during scale-up. Those handling the acid chloride face corrosivity concerns and stiffer regulatory control on handling and shipping. The ethyl ester, in the context of regulations and operator safety, lines up with much easier personal protective equipment requirements and lower hazard designations, making it less intimidating for new chemists to work with on the bench or in process scale reactors.
Our R&D team does not treat these molecules as static recipes. We run continuous improvement programs aimed at removing bottlenecks in batch consistency and extending the shelf-life of stored product. Using inline spectroscopic analytics during synthesis and recrystallization, we maintain a tighter process window and spot potential deviations before they enter the downstream purification train. Over the past year, implementation of these tools has cut overall lot rejection rates by nearly half, providing a more stable supply chain for our partners.
Further feedback from frequent users led us to optimize filtration and drying protocols. Solvent exchange methods now allow the removal of low-level impurities and avoid the product picking up water from ambient air—something which cropped up regularly in the field when distributors repackaged inadequately. Robust packaging and quicker final drying let our batches arrive as bright solids, without productive losses users once accepted as an inevitable waste.
For large-scale industrial campaigns, scale-up brings its own stress points with solvent loads and cycle times. We worked with multiple partners to replace specialty high-boiling solvents with lower-impact alternatives, both shrinking environmental footprint and easing solvent removal. Instead of relying on standard heating circuits, jacketed reactor controls now give more uniform temperature profiles, smoothing out batch variations and blocking hot-spot formation that drove earlier run-to-run drifts. Our partners now finish production runs with less downtime for filter changes or surprise equipment upset.
In our facility, each production batch goes through full spectroscopic and chromatographic assessment. We use NMR, LC-MS, and FTIR profiles to spot subtle shifts in product quality—sometimes before traditional quality tests would catch them. That might seem excessive, but eliminating these edge-case contaminants reduces headaches for our clients, who rarely want to troubleshoot in the middle of a multi-step synthesis.
Validating our analytical results against external laboratories builds another layer of confidence. Several years back, customers flagged discrepancies in melting point data. This prompted a program-wide update on temperature calibration and instrument qualification, so data now travel with every shipment. That move translated to quicker customer QA sign-off and fewer pre-batch meetings devoted to resolving quality hold-ups.
Retaining samples from every lot means we can quickly track and address any out-of-spec reports. On more than one occasion, this practice helped de-escalate a concern about uncharacteristic chromatographic peaks, traced not to our process, but to client-side storage conditions interacting with packaging. Those ongoing partnerships reinforce why our factory prioritizes transparency and open communication, instead of hiding behind standard technical bulletins or rigid order fulfillment.
For new product launches, academic groups and contract development teams frequently reach out about optimizing the transition from milligram research scale to multi-kilogram process. From experience, small details—like filtration rates, filtration media compatibility, or batch-to-batch melting point drift—can trip up fast-moving projects. When shifting from glassware to kilo reactors, many find that the clean transition performance of our imidazopyridine ester simplifies crystallizations; no excessive solvent switches or repeated vacuum drying cycles, so technical deadlines creep less in early development.
Manufacturers working on route scouting also report that the lower odor and lower volatility of our batches make bench work more comfortable and safer, especially for researchers working in open hoods day after day. Over a season, fewer exposure complaints point to practical benefits beyond just reaction yield, nudging more labs toward products with cleaner trace profiles and straightforward hazard statements.
With regulations tightening globally, downstream users focus more sharply on chemical inventories, REACH, TSCA, and other compliance issues. We commit to reducing problematic impurities and residual solvents, because these maintenance steps insulate end users from late-stage regulatory complications. We changed several filtration media and solvent types a few years ago to ensure our batches matched evolving requirements. Early, voluntary disclosure of manufacturing changes means customers avoid surprise testing delays and minimize bureaucratic back-and-forth.
Environmental impact also matters. Steps toward greener synthesis, including solvent recycling and waste minimization, have started making a visible difference. Shortening heat-up and cool-down times, swapping hazardous reagents for safer alternatives, and ensuring proper waste stream segregation all reflect the priorities of both our own workforce and the companies who source building blocks for modern synthesis. The choice of ethyl ester—over more recalcitrant functional groups—demonstrates a pragmatic approach to balancing biochemical flexibility and post-reaction recovery.
Looking beyond today, we invest in developing derivatives and analogs with tailored substituents on both the imidazopyridine core and the ester group. Researchers continue to request samples for beta-testing in emerging therapeutic classes and new crop solutions. This creates valuable feedback loops; observed successes or challenges push us to examine mechanisms, process side reactions, and scalability issues in greater detail. Raw learnings from these industrial collaborations sharpen our ability to serve as a reliable supply partner for long-term innovation.
Competitors have focused on maximizing output and lowering cost per kilogram. We instead emphasize ongoing process optimization and data-driven decision-making. For our users, that shows up in the real world as less material waste, fewer lost hours to QA hold-ups, and more consistent project progress. The continual communication between manufacturing, analytical, and customer service teams allows for a rapid response to any concerns, which our partners often cite as an improvement over prior, more transactional supplier relationships.
Several years ago, feedback from a pharma partner pointed out a subtle difference in impurity profile compared to a competitor’s lot. Our technical staff pulled archived samples, ran comparative analysis, and pinpointed a process deviation in one isolation step. The fix—a small tweak in filtration timing and solvent ratio—effectively erased the discrepancy, convincing not just the client but also internal teams to treat process feedback as a tool, not a burden. This culture of transparency and rapid iteration keeps batch quality at the top of the industry.
Where some chemical manufacturers restrict customer input to generic feedback forms, we see regular value from face-to-face project reviews. Discussing project bottlenecks and purity requirements in detail, on actual production lines, suggests tweaks that improve not just price but the daily usability of each lot. Process chemists and pilot plant leads can often trace a smoother project progression to these direct conversations, particularly as project scale grows and more hands touch the same batch.
In the past, volatility in raw material markets challenged our ability to keep lead times short. By securing multiple long-term feedstock agreements and running in-house stock management, we built up buffer capacity that absorbs short-term market shocks. Customers facing urgent campaign deadlines often share how this approach means less risk for their own projects—whether pharma, materials, or specialty applications—compared to relying on traders juggling inventory amid international fluctuations.
As end-use applications diversify, so do the challenges. Customization requests for specific ester chain lengths, isotopic labeling, or unique substitution patterns arrive with increasing frequency. Research support, both technical and process-based, continues to grow in importance alongside base manufacturing. Our hands-on experience with batch variability, impurity troubleshooting, and regulatory compliance means we step into these new roles far more smoothly than entities who focus only on price and volume.
Our entire operation, from raw material purchasing through final analytical release, builds on lessons gained through feedback—direct and indirect—from end users working in diverse chemistry environments. The drive for higher batch reliability, cleaner impurities, and more transparent data reporting stems from years of supporting both emerging biotech startups and established manufacturers. We anchor our process around these evolving needs, adapting workflows and technology investments that translate to real-world success in our customers’ projects.
Imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-6-carboxylic acid ethyl ester now stands as a dependable building block across several chemical industries because we treat it as more than just a commodity. Each lot represents a combination of careful raw material control, tested process adjustments, and real partnerships with users who expect more than standard paperwork. That tradition of hands-on improvement and close communication remains central as new fields find ways to incorporate these versatile heterocycles.