|
HS Code |
199839 |
| Iupac Name | ethyl methyl 2,6-dimethyl-4-(3-nitrophenyl)-1,4-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate |
| Molecular Formula | C19H22N2O6 |
| Molecular Weight | 374.39 g/mol |
| Appearance | Yellow crystalline solid |
| Melting Point | 175-180°C |
| Solubility | Soluble in organic solvents like ethanol and DMSO |
| Pka | Approximately 4.5-5.5 (for dihydropyridine NH) |
| Smiles | CCOC(=O)C1=C(C)N(C)C(C)=C(C1c2cccc(c2)[N+](=O)[O-])C(=O)OC |
| Inchi | InChI=1S/C19H22N2O6/c1-5-27-18(23)15-13(3)21(4)16(14(2)19(24)26-6-7)17(15)12-9-8-10-11-20(12,25)22 |
As an accredited ethyl methyl 2,6-dimethyl-4-(3-nitrophenyl)-1,4-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | A 25-gram amber glass bottle with a tamper-evident cap, labeled with chemical name, formula, hazard pictograms, and safety instructions. |
| Container Loading (20′ FCL) | Container Loading (20′ FCL): Securely packed 160–200 drums/barrels of ethyl methyl 2,6-dimethyl-4-(3-nitrophenyl)-1,4-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate per standard 20-foot container. |
| Shipping | This chemical, ethyl methyl 2,6-dimethyl-4-(3-nitrophenyl)-1,4-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate, must be shipped in tightly sealed containers, protected from light and moisture. It should be handled in accordance with all relevant chemical handling and transport regulations, using appropriate labeling, cushioning, and temperature control as needed to ensure safety and substance integrity. |
| Storage | Store ethyl methyl 2,6-dimethyl-4-(3-nitrophenyl)-1,4-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate in a tightly sealed container, away from light and moisture, in a cool, well-ventilated, and dry area. Keep separate from strong oxidizers and acids. Use appropriate personal protective equipment when handling. Clearly label the storage container and restrict access to authorized personnel only. Dispose of waste following local regulations. |
| Shelf Life | Shelf Life: Stable for 2–3 years when stored tightly sealed, protected from light, moisture, and air at 2–8°C. |
|
Purity 99%: Ethyl methyl 2,6-dimethyl-4-(3-nitrophenyl)-1,4-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate with 99% purity is used in pharmaceutical research synthesis, where it ensures high reproducibility and minimal side product formation. Melting point 156°C: Ethyl methyl 2,6-dimethyl-4-(3-nitrophenyl)-1,4-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate with a melting point of 156°C is used in tablet formulation processes, where it provides stable compounding and consistent dissolution rates. Molecular weight 386.39 g/mol: Ethyl methyl 2,6-dimethyl-4-(3-nitrophenyl)-1,4-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate with a molecular weight of 386.39 g/mol is used in ligand design for drug discovery, where it allows for accurate molecular modeling and efficient screening. Particle size <10 μm: Ethyl methyl 2,6-dimethyl-4-(3-nitrophenyl)-1,4-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate with particle size less than 10 μm is used in topical formulation development, where it ensures uniform dispersion and enhanced bioavailability. Stability temperature 80°C: Ethyl methyl 2,6-dimethyl-4-(3-nitrophenyl)-1,4-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate with a stability temperature of 80°C is used in industrial storage and transportation, where it maintains chemical integrity under moderate thermal conditions. |
Competitive ethyl methyl 2,6-dimethyl-4-(3-nitrophenyl)-1,4-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615371019725 or mail to sales7@boxa-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: sales7@boxa-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Making chemicals like ethyl methyl 2,6-dimethyl-4-(3-nitrophenyl)-1,4-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate isn’t just about matching a set of formulas. The real world in a chemical plant rarely matches what textbooks predict. Over long years working with dihydropyridines, you find that even tiny changes in moisture, temperature, and the source of starting materials throw off outcomes. So each batch of this compound means more than mixing: it’s a disciplined balance that comes with years of learning where pitfalls lie and how to sidestep them before trouble starts.
On the floor, skilled workers measure not only purity but stability, cake texture, and reactivity. We don’t just tick off a list of chemical specifications—tests involve the senses, like picking up on an off-color in the finished batch or a faint smell change in the reaction pot. Even trusted suppliers of precursors can deliver subtle shifts batch to batch. Our line foremen can recall times when a change unnoticed by a less experienced crew would have slipped past, but training and repetition turn intuition into practice. We make sure each drum going out the door meets not only the numbers on a data sheet but fits the actual work—or the product never leaves the plant.
Diving straight into ethyl methyl 2,6-dimethyl-4-(3-nitrophenyl)-1,4-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate: this molecule belongs to the family of 1,4-dihydropyridines, a backbone you’ll find in many pharmacologically active molecules and specialized intermediates. At the manufacturing scale, you have to make choices at every step—starting with which grade of methyl acetoacetate and what nitrobenzaldehyde feedstock to trust. Experience shows that off-the-shelf options can turn a clean reaction sluggish or muddy. At production scale, the penalties for a contaminated or variable precursor stretch out beyond yield—cleanup, waste disposal, and even safety margins are affected. Our plant supervisors dig their heels in when it comes to source changes, insisting on only the most consistent lots year after year.
Most customers need ethyl methyl 2,6-dimethyl-4-(3-nitrophenyl)-1,4-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate for its role as an advanced intermediate in complex organic synthesis. Academic research, pharmaceutical lead development, and specialty material prototyping all call out its unique reactivity. Researchers gravitate toward it for the electron-withdrawing nitro group at the phenyl ring, which imparts a specific activation pattern—handy for further functionalizations or ring modifications. Production on the manufacturing line requires strict control of temperature and stirring speed, or you get clumping and sticky byproducts. Our foremen keep detailed records on each batch, creating playbooks for precise process control, built on blood, sweat, and honest mistakes. Every shipment includes not only an assay but also a written summary of lot observations and historic quirks, so users receive the real context behind the raw numbers.
More than once, outside manufacturers or labs have tried to substitute a “similar” dihydropyridine, hoping for cost savings or easier sourcing. We have watched outcomes. Subtle changes in ring methylation, ester group selection, or nitro positioning shift both chemical reactivity and physical handling. A para nitro group, instead of the meta, tweaks both the speed and selectivity of follow-up steps. Drop the methyl group at position 2 or 6, and suddenly filtration slows down, yields slip, and downstream purification demands extra effort. These results show up as phone calls from customers needing technical guidance, and our technical team steps in with batch histories, shelf life studies, and practical observations.
Back when reactor bottlenecks hit, some engineers proposed making blended batches to keep up with a surge in demand. Troubles followed almost immediately: blends never fully duplicated the melting point, impurity profile, or thermal stability of true single-batch material. Our process engineers found that even a 2 °C shift in melting point hints at trace-level polymerized byproduct. Cut corners, and the research team spends weeks untangling new analytic results. Our shop floor watches out for process shortcuts, sticking to every check—even the ones that seem slow—because experience has taught us two things: reputation comes from reliability, and there’s no shortcut to a clean product history.
In this business, specific models and grades often shape our conversations with customers. For this dihydropyridine, the base model reflects the core molecule, but we offer controlled variants defined by water content, assay range, and—perhaps most importantly—filtration behavior. Experienced lab staff often pay attention to packaging, crystal habit, and observed color since these details affect real handling in the glovebox or reactor. Shippers seal the product under inert gas, knowing well that contamination by air or light degrades batch quality and spoils further chemistry work. In some pharmaceutical projects, only product lineages that trace back through every precursor and process variable pass muster—they know risks aren’t worth a failed batch downstream.
Our attention runs all the way to final drum labeling, but it starts much earlier. Plant managers insist every run gets double-checked for off-odor, off-color, and microcrystal distribution. We learned this through lessons that came at real cost; time lost, off-spec product disposed of, clients lost and later—after improved protocols—won back. It’s not only about pushing documentation for audits; practical experience says a missed observation today shows up as a bigger problem months later.
Some customers debate the merits of buying in bulk or pre-packed smaller quantities for higher-value synthesis. Each approach carries its own strengths, but from our vantage point as a manufacturer, shipping purity holds up better in original sealed drums, especially for moisture-sensitive molecules like this one. Bulk buyers in industrial settings sometimes request modified packaging—double sealed pails, low-humidity liners, or nitrogen backfilled kegs. Our fulfillment team maintains readiness for specialized requests and keeps a margin for variations, knowing that a careless break in the supply chain can kill months of customer R&D progress.
Across years of working with R&D teams chasing new catalysts, bioactive agents, and advanced materials, we have seen that quick fixes fail if the underlying intermediate lacks clear provenance. Labs rushing to start pilot reactions sometimes try to make small lots of this compound on their own, but direct-from-manufacturer batches consistently outpace in both yield and control of impurities—especially at kilo-lab scale. Real-world manufacturing uncovers quirks that a benchtop synth just can’t reveal, like how a small byproduct, invisible on micro-chromatograms, throws off photoreactivity or storage stability three months down the line.
Plenty of players in the chemical supply world offer this molecule as part of a catalog. Most act as traders and resellers who never see the product pass through their own hands. We’ve fielded more support calls from buyers who previously tried speculative or repackaged sources and found their samples arrived with unknown shelf time, off-spec melting points, or non-matching batch numbers. A recurring headache in the market comes from "commodity" thinking about complex intermediates—the assumption that surface numbers equal quality. We see daily that true traceability and process control beat price competition, especially where later synthesis stages demand uncompromising reliability.
The lessons from direct manufacturing make a difference. Troubleshooting support isn’t abstract: our technical staff can reference day-of-batch logs, assay runs, and real plant notes. One phone call brings up discussion about which shift team carried out a synthesis and which QA inspector checked that lot’s critical specs. Where traders give guesses, we give detailed readings and tracked observations because we lived the process from reactor charge to filling and sealing the container. Reliability comes not from intention but from experience and a willingness to learn from each run, good or bad.
Chemists sometimes ask what sets this product apart from related dihydropyridines, such as those with different substitution at the phenyl ring or ethyl/methyl ester groups swapped. Based on our manufacturing logs and feedback from users, these changes go deeper than just notation. For example, altering the ester to a bulkier iso-propyl group slows down downstream hydrolysis and shifts HPLC impurity profiles. Shift the nitro group from meta to ortho or para, and you see changed melting points, altered reactivity toward reduction, and a marked shift in stability of the crystalline solid on extended storage.
Stability, yield, handling ease, and purity all tie right back to—often—minute structural differences. We have run stability trials expressly requested by pharmaceutical clients, storing both the target and several closely related dihydropyridines under forced degradation conditions: humidity, temperature cycling, and bright light. This product time and again outlasted similar compounds, showing clearer end-points and fewer decomposition byproducts, which translates to easier downstream workups and cleaner separations. This edge comes from both inherent properties and our fine-tuned process controls developed over years in direct production.
The pace of change in chemistry, particularly as more projects move into microgram and milligram scale for early development, means we adapt our preparation and packaging routines regularly. Ten years ago, most pilots took several hundred grams; now, researchers sometimes run dozens of experiments with just a few grams each. Our approach balances this evolution by offering both large-run and split-packaging runs, with careful monitoring for cross-contamination or small batch artifact. At every point, feedback from real-world use shapes process tweaks, from reducing trace solvents to changing drying times after crystallization. Our willingness to share not just what but how we prepare this intermediate has built a feedback loop with those who use it at the frontier of innovation.
Researchers rely on timely technical answers—the kind that come only from being the true original manufacturer. Maintaining this knowledge means line leads and QC chemists stay connected, both as practitioners and as trusted advisors. Additions to the workflow sometimes result from insights shared after a customer call or a troubleshooting session yielding a new best practice: adjusting filtration pressure, tweaking oven drying cycles, or even updating shipping insulation protocols. This tight connection to reality means we stay ready to match evolving industry needs, not just sell product off a static catalog.
Learning what works does not come only from what went right. The record books at our plant hold detailed descriptions of trials that failed, impurities that persisted, and product lost to storage problems. We have kept and revisited these logs year after year, refining batch instructions and troubleshooting guides. This humility—accepting, tracking, and learning from the whole production journey—keeps us responsive as new challenges crop up from regulatory changes, new customer requests, or evolving supply chains.
Example: years ago, a client reported troubling impurity peaks during scale-up of a downstream process. Pulling batch records showed a rarely noted side reaction at the phenyl nitro site, visible after extended storage, compounded by higher summer humidity. That information let us both tweak our plant cooling and packaging steps while giving the client an effective workaround until next shipment. We brought this learning into all later batches, cutting repeat problems to near zero and strengthening our product’s reputation as more than "just another dihydropyridine."
Those who depend on intermediates like ethyl methyl 2,6-dimethyl-4-(3-nitrophenyl)-1,4-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate often work at the unexplored edge—new drug candidates, undisclosed compounds, advanced organic electronics. Meeting these needs only succeeds with consistent, direct-from-plant quality, rooted in direct knowledge by those who make the product, not just move it around a market chain. We see our purpose not just as producers, but as partners to innovation, ready to answer questions over shelf life, unusual downstream reactions, or risk analysis for process upscaling.
The commitment we hold moves past just numbers and specs. It’s made up of steady hands at the reactor, many years of documentation, and a mindset that puts learning from every run—good or not so good—front and center. Each batch carries a history, and every customer is working to build their next success on the reliability we supply, drum after drum, shipment after shipment. The relationship is much more than transaction; it is trust built on what we know, what we have seen, and what we bring forward through real-world, daily manufacturing practice.
In a world quick to treat chemistry like a commodity, our answer is experience. Every process improvement, every flag on a batch record, every shared technical story forms the chain that keeps this product sharp, dependable, and ready for complicated chemistry work where the stakes are high and the margins for error small. This bond between direct manufacturing and scientific advance shapes everything we do. If this molecule forms a link in your process, our insight—built batch by batch, lesson by lesson—makes certain it is the strongest one in your chain.