|
HS Code |
984366 |
| Iupac Name | 4-(Benzoylamino)-1-(2-deoxy-beta-L-erythro-pentofuranosyl)-2(1H)-pyrimidinone |
| Molecular Formula | C16H17N3O5 |
| Molecular Weight | 331.32 g/mol |
| Cas Number | 564-00-1 |
| Pubchem Cid | 3033832 |
| Appearance | White to off-white solid |
| Solubility | Soluble in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO); sparingly soluble in water |
| Melting Point | Approximately 210-215°C (decomposes) |
| Smiles | C1=CC=C(C=C1)C(=O)NC2=NC(=O)N(C=C2)C3C(C(C(O3)CO)O)O |
| Inchi | InChI=1S/C16H17N3O5/c20-11-8-18(14-9-19(15(22)17-14)16(23)24)12-7-21-13(12)10-4-2-1-3-5-10/h1-5,8-9,12-13,21H,6-7H2,(H,17,22,23,24)/t12-,13-/m0/s1 |
| Synonyms | Bz-dU; Benzoyl-deoxyuridine |
| Storage Conditions | Store at -20°C, protected from light and moisture |
As an accredited 4-(Benzoylamino)-1-(2-deoxy-beta-L-erythro-pentofuranosyl)-2(1H)-pyrimidinone factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Amber glass vial labeled “4-(Benzoylamino)-1-(2-deoxy-β-L-erythro-pentofuranosyl)-2(1H)-pyrimidinone, 100 mg, store at -20°C.” |
| Container Loading (20′ FCL) | Container Loading (20′ FCL) for 4-(Benzoylamino)-1-(2-deoxy-beta-L-erythro-pentofuranosyl)-2(1H)-pyrimidinone: Securely packed, temperature-controlled, compliant with chemical transport regulations, preventing contamination and degradation during international shipping. |
| Shipping | The chemical 4-(Benzoylamino)-1-(2-deoxy-beta-L-erythro-pentofuranosyl)-2(1H)-pyrimidinone is shipped in tightly sealed containers, protected from light and moisture. It is handled under temperature-controlled conditions, typically room temperature or as specified. Packaging complies with relevant safety regulations to prevent leaks or contamination during transport. Detailed shipping documentation accompanies each order. |
| Storage | 4-(Benzoylamino)-1-(2-deoxy-β-L-erythro-pentofuranosyl)-2(1H)-pyrimidinone should be stored in a tightly closed container, protected from light and moisture. Keep at 2–8°C (refrigerator) in a dry, well-ventilated area. Avoid exposure to strong oxidizing agents. Ensure proper labeling and keep away from incompatible chemicals to maintain stability and safety. |
| Shelf Life | Shelf life: Store at -20°C, protected from light and moisture; stable for at least 2 years under recommended conditions. |
Competitive 4-(Benzoylamino)-1-(2-deoxy-beta-L-erythro-pentofuranosyl)-2(1H)-pyrimidinone prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615371019725 or mail to sales7@boxa-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: sales7@boxa-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Making nucleoside analogs like 4-(Benzoylamino)-1-(2-deoxy-beta-L-erythro-pentofuranosyl)-2(1H)-pyrimidinone draws on years of navigating organic synthesis. Our approach leverages hands-on adjustments with each run, responding to subtleties only noticed by direct involvement in the process. Some materials react unpredictably to small fluctuations in moisture or pH, and those moments always demand real-time problem-solving, not a reliance on generic reaction schemes.
This compound forms part of a foundation used in studying genetic processes, and we manufacture it because our customers drive their research on the reliability of each batch. We monitor each step, refining purification routines to separate unintended side-products we see emerge during the sequence. Rather than leaving yields to chance, we developed post-synthesis protocols to retain the integrity of the pentofuranosyl ring—an area that causes headaches if even trace amounts of water enter at the wrong time.
Producing meaningful quantities calls for well-honed planning. Scale-up reveals which details mattered most at small scale: issues like foaming in solution, batch sedimentation, and reaction quenching all get amplified. We purposely select glassware, dryers, and handling routines that reduce exposure, since one unexpected humidity spike in the lab ruins months of planning.
Every batch comes out with slight visible differences. Sometimes the final material appears as dense white powder, but varying crystal size can reflect adjustments to cooling rate or minor changes in solvent choice for precipitation. We sample every lot for actual chemical content, not just theoretical purity. UV, NMR, and MS tell us whether the molecule reflects the correct structure, so we never swap lots just because the usual purity numbers are on paper.
Physical handling matters as much as molecular analysis. Static charge, clumping from micro-impurities, and small losses during weigh-out force us to rethink standard approaches. We use antistatic equipment, adjust humidity, and practice careful weigh-by-difference not to lose product at production scale. Our skilled team learns to spot contaminants and out-of-trend appearance trends that automated systems cannot flag.
Over time, minor impurities—like partially deprotected nucleosides or byproducts from incomplete benzoylation—crop up even under stable conditions. As a manufacturer, our intervention is to halt the release until the real-world performance matches what customers demand. This often means re-purifying or rejecting a batch rather than risking someone’s synthetic pathway hitting an unexpected wall. For us, experience means learning which tiny deviations matter and which can get safely ignored.
Most of our customers come from labs where each new molecule serves as a tool for DNA, RNA, or enzyme-related studies. The appeal of this compound doesn’t lie just in its structure; its consistent behavior under different conditions gets scientists to trust what they receive. Years of feedback stress the importance of solubility, reproducibility, and minimal contaminant interference, especially when researchers use the compound in oligonucleotide synthesis, molecular biology protocols, or enzyme activity assays.
Enzymatic processes show very sharp sensitivities to trace impurities. Our long-standing customers share that a “risky” batch, when sourced from less regulated channels, often sacrifices weeks of downstream research. Researchers want to know that the 2-deoxy-beta-L-erythro-pentofuranosyl part isn’t contaminated by D-isomers, swapped functional groups, or other hidden traps. Our process selects for these requirements, confirming with advanced chiral and structural analyses.
Another aspect we address arises from solubility and stability. Crystalline or powdered forms change their properties if they’re exposed to light, moisture, or heat during storage. Because most project timelines can’t tolerate delays from unstable material, we always opt for extra protective packaging and accelerated stability studies before we ship. Nothing beats the reputation built from a decade with practically zero customer complaints regarding sample quality or shelf stability.
Consistency gives scientists reliable data, and transparency builds the trust that gets projects moving ahead. Real consistency means our batches behave the same way in every lab, not just in analytical paperwork. Frequently, customers reach out to recount how the difference in yield or reactivity tracks straight back to small sources of impurities. Having manufactured the compound ourselves, these reports never surprise us—each cycle in our lab teaches which steps control the outcome and which ones let irreproducible results creep in.
Some commercial products flood the market with only paper-based characterization, skipping in-depth structure confirmation. From our side, years of invested time avoiding variable quality mean we focus on structural consistency, confirmed repeatedly on actual production lots, not just pilot samples. That means hands-on review of NMR traces, repeated checking of chromatography profiles, and confirming both the benzoyl and deoxyribose components stay pure and untampered by batch-to-batch drift.
It’s easier to talk straight about a product’s quirks and strengths when you control the tech behind it. We hear frustration from labs who once relied on bulk suppliers that leave questions about provenance unanswered. Our direct involvement erases that uncertainty: batches get tied back to actual production logs, and every improvement springs from a closed feedback loop between manufacturing scientists and our partners in research.
Sometimes the toughest lessons come from failed attempts at scaling or from customer reports about unexpected results. One project taught us how critical it is to verify ring integrity in nucleoside synthesis, since byproducts built up undetected until isolated at several grams. Another time, a switch to a new solvent system yielded crystal forms with poor filterability—a small tweak for efficiency ended up costing far more time in troubleshooting and recovery than sticking to the original.
Every time we see unexpected peaks in analytical runs, or a drop in crystallization efficiency, we look at what could have gone differently at each step. Team discussions following any nonconforming batch always focus on the lessons learned: did we let storage temperatures stray? Was there a change in the reagent’s origin or treatment? Which operator’s notes reveal subtle changes that correlate to the analytical trend?
Because we occupy the full loop from raw reagents to final product, these iterations don’t impose extra waiting periods or confusion. Feedback from partners and users loops directly back to process modification without bureaucracy. As a result, our specification sheet grows only from repeated direct experience and problem-solving, not by copying competitors or letting standards drift by committee.
From the outside, many nucleoside derivatives look interchangeable. Subtle variations matter. The benzoylamino modification in this molecule protects the reactive amine in a way that supports further derivatization, makes for different stability profiles in synthesis, or serves unique roles in research on nucleotide analogs. The L-erythro stereochemistry in the pentofuranosyl ring stands in contrast to the more common D-analogs. This impacts how the molecule fits into biological pathways, interacts with enzymes, or behaves in hybridization reactions.
Other offerings in the market sometimes blend D and L forms, blur the boundaries between protected and unprotected sugars, or leave more ambiguity in their reported purity. Because we run our own structural analysis—chiral, mass spectrometry, and custom reactivity tests—we stand behind the differences in both chemical and functional purity. For research in nucleic acid biochemistry and medicinal chemistry, these variations become the deciding factor in which compound delivers usable results and which leads down blind alleys.
Customers tell us that lower-cost alternatives from bulk traders often lead to batch failures because undefined protecting groups or mixed isomer content send downstream chemistry off course. We never blend product from different preparation routes or settle for “good enough” standards—one consistent route underpins all material. This approach has proven itself across thousands of grams destined for international projects in nucleic acid therapeutics, sequencing, and structure-activity studies.
Each field sets different demands on materials. In oligonucleotide synthesis, reliable removal of the benzoyl group becomes critical when the product enters the deprotection step. Loss of yield or unexpected side-reactions at that point waste resources, so we perform stress trials on every lot to catch reactivity drift before shipping. Enzymatic studies ask for high chirality control, since non-natural stereochemistry can completely change an experiment’s outcome; our layout checks retention of stereochemistry, confirmed with each run.
To meet the challenge in radiolabeling or diagnostic probe synthesis, stability under brief thermal surges and light exposure matters. We monitor for these responses with each production sequence, only approving lots that stay unchanged in test storage over real time periods. Our investment reaches as far as small details—like re-sealing methods and choice of containers—because we know any slip here carries through to the bench, where every hour and reagent counts double.
In customer-driven protocols, such as primer extension, probe labeling, or structure-activity relationship mapping, our compound’s reproducibility allows researchers to avoid revisiting synthetic steps or recalibrating protocols for uncertain inputs. We hear from long-term collaborators that avoiding repeat troubleshooting saves considerable overtime, unplanned reagent splurges, and the intangible confidence hit from unexplained inconsistent behavior.
Manufacturing a molecule like this extends beyond technical mastery. The work tests every assumption on repeatability, chemical hygiene, record-keeping precision, and resilience against process drift. Years spent in real labs, adapting plenty of chemical literature to tools and conditions in our hands, eliminated any illusion that paper specs tell the whole story. Customer feedback and internal review keep us alert to every area where improvements make a difference.
Our ongoing challenge lies in handling larger orders without dropping the standards that shaped our earliest runs. Automation helps, but only hand-in-glove with seasoned eyes on the ground. Staff who know the past quirks of each process option keep us from repeating mistakes buried in the fine print of rarely-consulted logs. Having seen what can go wrong, small details—gloves changed more frequently, glass dried longer, or solutions stirred and kept overnight rather than hurried—define what batches are worth sending on to research partners.
Accountability means clarifying the source and specifics of the product. Every lot tracks back to the specific synthesis, purification, and sign-off, with all deviations logged openly. Only by controlling this end-to-end flow can we assure that materials don’t just check a box but actually move our customers’ discoveries ahead. Our philosophy reflects lived lessons: the time and cost of correcting an error after shipment always dwarf those of catching it beforehand.
Over the years, success in making and delivering research-grade nucleoside analogs has focused our work around supporting discovery rather than chasing spec numbers for their own sake. Our teams share hands-on stories of where the molecule advanced a new finding, let a novel diagnostic unfold, or powered an unexpected breakthrough in nucleic acid chemistry. From our side, hearing about real publications and seeing acknowledgment for material that performed as it should brings more satisfaction than industry awards or commodity-driven competition.
We recognize the downstream importance of standards that keep tightening, with greater focus on data reproducibility, method transparency, and sustainable chemical sourcing. Our next steps keep building on direct lab observations. Each small discovery in process improvement—whether that means slightly upgraded filtration, a tweak in protective handling, or a streamlined sequence—feeds back into better product. For the future, this molecule and its cousins will respond to new scientific needs, as biochemistry and therapeutic research raise new challenges for purity, stability, and scalability.
Looking ahead, as fast science places new pressure on both production and quality, we keep our eyes on experience over paper compliance. The difference comes not from the molecule alone, but from its real journey from flask to researcher’s bench—where every gram, every crystalline change, and every small impurity tell a story only manufacturers steeped in the work understand. Working in partnership with scientists and staying accountable to the compound’s full history, we continue shaping our craft with the details that move discovery forward.