|
HS Code |
494056 |
| Chemical Name | 3-pyridinecarboxylic acid, 6-chloro-4-ethoxy- |
| Molecular Formula | C8H8ClNO3 |
| Molecular Weight | 201.61 g/mol |
| Cas Number | 19850-37-6 |
| Appearance | White to off-white solid |
| Boiling Point | Decomposes before boiling |
| Solubility In Water | Slightly soluble |
| Smiles | CCOC1=CC(Cl)=NC=C1C(=O)O |
| Purity | Typically >98% (for research grade) |
| Storage Conditions | Store in a cool, dry place, away from light |
| Hazard Classification | Irritant |
As an accredited 3-pyridinecarboxylic acid, 6-chloro-4-ethoxy- factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Amber glass bottle containing 100 grams of 3-pyridinecarboxylic acid, 6-chloro-4-ethoxy-, tightly sealed with a tamper-evident cap. |
| Container Loading (20′ FCL) | 20′ FCL typically holds 12 MT of 3-pyridinecarboxylic acid, 6-chloro-4-ethoxy-, packed in 25 kg fiber drums. |
| Shipping | 3-Pyridinecarboxylic acid, 6-chloro-4-ethoxy- should be shipped in compliance with all applicable chemical transportation regulations. Package in tightly sealed, compatible containers with appropriate hazard labeling. Protect from moisture, heat, and physical damage. Include Safety Data Sheet (SDS) with shipment. Handle and transport as a potentially hazardous material, ensuring secure delivery to a qualified recipient. |
| Storage | Store **3-pyridinecarboxylic acid, 6-chloro-4-ethoxy-** in a tightly closed container in a cool, dry, and well-ventilated area. Keep away from incompatible materials such as strong oxidizers and bases. Protect from moisture, direct sunlight, and sources of ignition. Label the container clearly, and handle according to appropriate chemical safety guidelines and local regulations for hazardous materials. |
| Shelf Life | Shelf life of 3-pyridinecarboxylic acid, 6-chloro-4-ethoxy-: Typically stable for 2-3 years when stored in a cool, dry place. |
|
[Purity 98%]: 3-pyridinecarboxylic acid, 6-chloro-4-ethoxy- with a purity of 98% is used in pharmaceutical intermediate synthesis, where it ensures high yield and minimal by-product formation. [Melting point 145°C]: 3-pyridinecarboxylic acid, 6-chloro-4-ethoxy- featuring a melting point of 145°C is used in organic synthesis, where it offers process consistency and thermal stability. [Molecular weight 215.62 g/mol]: 3-pyridinecarboxylic acid, 6-chloro-4-ethoxy- at a molecular weight of 215.62 g/mol is used in medicinal chemistry research, where it supports precise molecular design and activity optimization. [Particle size ≤50 micron]: 3-pyridinecarboxylic acid, 6-chloro-4-ethoxy- with particle size ≤50 micron is used in formulation development, where it provides uniform dispersion and reproducibility in solid dosage forms. [Stability temperature up to 120°C]: 3-pyridinecarboxylic acid, 6-chloro-4-ethoxy- stable up to 120°C is used in advanced coatings, where it maintains structural integrity during curing processes. [Water content <0.5%]: 3-pyridinecarboxylic acid, 6-chloro-4-ethoxy- with water content less than 0.5% is used in moisture-sensitive synthesis, where it prevents hydrolysis and ensures product purity. |
Competitive 3-pyridinecarboxylic acid, 6-chloro-4-ethoxy- prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615371019725 or mail to sales7@boxa-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: sales7@boxa-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Many years on the production floor have taught us that every chemical carries a distinct fingerprint—shaped by process routes, raw materials, and attention to detail at each stage. 3-Pyridinecarboxylic acid, 6-chloro-4-ethoxy-, known to some by its structural shorthand or as a key intermediate in pharmaceutical synthesis, stands apart because of the demands placed on consistency and high-purity standards. Talking with researchers and end users over the years, we hear certain priorities repeated: reproducibility, purity, and reliability from batch to batch. Below, I want to walk through what we’ve learned manufacturing this compound, how it’s being used, and what sets it apart from similar pyridine derivatives.
Compared to more routine pyridine carboxylic acids, 6-chloro-4-ethoxy substitution intensifies the complexity of each synthesis run. At our plant, quality always starts with feedstock. We source fine-grade starting materials—chlorinated pyridines and carefully dried alcohols so that any water or residual impurities don’t haunt the next batch. We vet every lot using GC and LC-MS before clearing it to the reactors.
Reaction conditions have to be tuned precisely. Automated sensors record reaction temperature, pH, and pressure at frequent intervals, but experience keeps the process on course. A slight deviation in the introduction of the ethoxy group, for instance, throws off yields and can seed the product with unwanted isomers. We rely on in-line IR spectroscopy to monitor progress and endpoint; this isn’t just lab work—the interpretation often falls to shift leads who have run hundreds of batches and can spot minor spectral changes that signal if something is off. From personal experience, more frequent sampling—especially during scale-up—helps avoid waste and keeps recoveries high.
Purification separates strong producers from marginal ones. Our purification loop includes multistage filtration, solvent extraction, and a targeted crystallization that pulls impurities away by exploiting small differences in solubility. At this stage, pursuing marginal improvements in solvent purity or filter performance pays off with better downstream analytics. By the time the substance reaches the drying ovens, our internal limits for residual solvents (typically below a few hundred ppm) and unreacted starting materials are stricter than regional regulations require. Once dried and milled, each lot gets full-spectrum analytical profiles—^1H/^13C NMR, triple-point melting range, plus HPLC for trace contaminant scans.
Specifications for this product reflect not just regulatory minimums but years of direct feedback from formulation chemists and QA managers. Our standard purity sits above 99%, with water content usually under 0.1%. We calibrate these levels after examining hundreds of shipment analytics; outliers trace back to small changes upstream—filter swap-outs, changes in plant temperature, or even quality fluctuations in compressed gas supplies. Whenever we spot a recurring variance, we adjust documentation and process controls to rule out repeat issues.
Particle size operations count for more than most realize. Milling imparts stress to the crystals and can generate local heat buildup, causing batch-to-batch appearance differences. We swapped to a lower-shear, chilled mill setup several years ago after fielding end-user complaints about flow in automated feeders. The difference in final product smoothness and stability was noted by formulators who use compactors and feeders requiring narrow size distributions. Our internal sieve test rejects any lots outside the 90% confidence interval for size fraction, which pays dividends for downstream processability.
Most inquiries for 6-chloro-4-ethoxy-3-pyridinecarboxylic acid come from the pharmaceutical sector, but there’s a growing trickle of agrochemical and fine chemical inquiries. End users often cite the molecule’s value in complex heterocyclic syntheses. Several of our largest customers use it to create intermediates for active pharmaceutical ingredients, and we’ve worked through scale-up challenges shoulder-to-shoulder with their scientists. Small pilot bundles let process teams at customer sites dial in their own reaction conditions before committing to bigger runs. Our feedback often leads to recipe changes—whether it’s solvent switches or drying cycle tweaks—tailored to their in-house requirements.
Field feedback reaches us through QC reports and personal outreach. Most common are requests to minimize color and odor carryover, which can impact both laboratory work and appearance of finished products. Early on, we saw cases where batches bore a faint yellowish tint (trace halide formation from process shortcuts). We traced this to minor impurities in one class of solvents and switched suppliers, clearing up the issue. Oddly, some customers demand tighter chloride control for biopharmaceutical synthesis than for small-molecule drug manufacturing. Meeting those requests takes direct action—extra wash cycles and tighter lot segregation—rather than relying on generic “purification” approaches.
Those familiar with classic pyridinecarboxylic acids, such as isonicotinic or nicotinic acids, immediately spot core differences here. The 6-chloro and 4-ethoxy substitutions complicate the synthesis and also introduce new handling quirks. For instance, the ethoxy group increases lipophilicity, impacting both solubility in organic solvents and downstream process selection. Direct feedback from engineers tells us this feature opens new possibilities for designing molecules soluble enough for non-aqueous formulations. Yet, this very benefit requires updated safety protocols and customized storage—crystals can cake if warehouse humidity spikes, something the parent pyridine acids rarely face.
The presence of chlorine brings catalysis challenges, especially in scale-up. We saw slower than expected conversion rates in hydrogenation reactions for some clients who shifted over from non-halogenated versions. Our R&D team tackled this with targeted impurity tracking and slight pH adjustments during workup—collaboration that highlights both the obstacles and opportunities in working with these functionalized intermediates.
We’ve carried out direct, side-by-side comparison batches for customers considering shifting from more basic pyridinecarboxylic acids to the 6-chloro-4-ethoxy version. Main performance differences show up in melting point (significantly higher), solvent compatibility (broader in organic but lower in water), and downstream functionalization. Synthetically, that translates to broader utility for medicinal chemists or process developers seeking alternatives to classic building blocks. From the plant floor, we have learned that reliability in structure means reliability in finished applications.
Modern customers demand detail beyond what’s listed on abasic certificate of analysis. Supply-chain disruptions, growing regulatory scrutiny, and a push for green chemistry practices open the playbook further. At our site, batch tracking does not just log final measurements: our digital records keep histories on every input, reaction control adjustment, and key operator activity. Staff know that mistakes in recording solvent switches or filter changes ripple outward, causing potential delays for end users. This traceability helped us isolate some sources of trace bromide contamination that originated with a single drum of solvent delivered out of hours—the paper trail nailed it in days, not weeks.
We also undergo regular audits, both self-imposed and customer-driven. Over one year, we hosted nearly a dozen remote and on-site reviews. Most cover the basics—process controls, record retention, and analytical calibration—but sharp-eyed inspectors have brought up overlooked maintenance intervals or rare impurity spikes. Feedback often translates directly into process tweaks, from adding redundant sensors to retooling batch log procedures. Sharing audit results company-wide ensures lessons filter out beyond a single shift or department.
Sustainable manufacturing remains one of the most persistent pressures facing the chemical field. Handling halogenated intermediates raises real questions about waste management and emissions. On our lines, efforts to minimize solvent and energy waste are ongoing, propelled by both internal goals and external regulation. Solvent reuse rates have improved as we installed recovery stills and developed more robust clean-in-place procedures. Even marginal gains—a few percent here and there—translate to measurable reduction in cost and waste over a full production year.
Treatment of chlorinated waste gets extra care. Incineration and distillation units are regularly validated for performance and emissions compliance, with process data reported directly into our local regulatory management system. Instances of off-specification waste output prompt root-cause deep-dives—often involving cross-discipline teams from engineering, environmental, and plant operations. We’re trained to recognize that improving sustainability isn’t just about ticking checkboxes; it’s about embedding habits and vigilance into daily work. Dedicated training modules ensure new hires and long-timers alike know both the why and the how of safer handling and responsible disposal.
Customer requirements evolve each year. Trace contamination thresholds continue to become more precise, and biopharma and fine chemical sectors push upstream suppliers harder. We keep our chemical and analytical teams talking to user groups and QA specialists to close any communication gaps. This often means adjusting batch documentation beyond legal minimums—adding full impurity matrices, staging mock recalls for traceability practice, and providing deeper detail on thermal and storage sensitivities.
Market shifts are felt in everyday work, too. As more countries develop advanced pharmaceutical manufacturing clusters, lead times compress and logistics expectations rise. In response, we use modular packaging and flexible batch splitting, supporting small pilot runs and commercial-scale lots from the same lines. The benefit shows up in speed: users moving from discovery chemistry to scale-up don’t face material gaps or sudden quality drops.
Long-term relationships with end users mean more than just filling orders. Troubleshooting remains a major part of the support we provide. Over the years, we’ve helped solve process interruptions caused by trace impurities, provided emergency rush shipments to keep customer plants running, and adjusted drying protocols in response to novel downstream requirements. Detailed technical notes, shared openly, solve problems well before formal complaints reach the desk; these two-way discussions help us tune both manufacturing and logistics.
New applications keep surfacing as well. Research chemists share experimental failures as well as successes—data on cross-reactivity, shelf life, or solvent compatibility often prompts us to tweak process parameters or analytical tests. Practical feedback sometimes points out issues too subtle to appear in standard quality checks, like minor static buildup or packaging flaws that only emerge in automated dispensing. Listening and rapid response—across time zones and languages—ensure we fix issues before they scale.
In day-to-day manufacturing, small molecular changes drive big process shifts. The chloro-ethoxy substituted 3-pyridinecarboxylic acid doesn’t behave quite like its simpler cousins. Extra substituted groups increase reactivity with certain reagents and protect against some routes of byproduct formation, making tight control essential for both synthetic efficiency and reproducibility. Over years, we’ve found that simple steps—draining lines more completely between product runs, or using pre-cooled reaction vessels during especially humid months—stave off issues large and small.
Structural tweaks also impact final user experience in subtle but important ways. For pure research work, the ability to run reactions without unknown side-paths leads to more reliable discoveries. For production, repeatable crystallization and handling characteristics reduce operator error and support continuous improvement initiatives. The chain from our reactor to lab bench or packaging line grows stronger with each improvement.
We stay in touch with both academic updates and evolving market standards. Engaging directly with user groups—whether through digital platforms, seminars, or site visits—keeps us alert to new opportunities and upcoming challenges. This real-time feedback, combined with formal post-market study of shipped batches, has uncovered potential uses and flagged risk areas before regulatory changes forced our hand.
Learning circulates in both directions. We have taken suggestions from partners running innovative catalyst systems and tested them in our pilot suite, sometimes incorporating these changes upstream in our large-scale reactors. Retrospective analysis of lots shipped over the years has given us insight into how minor environmental factors—a hot summer, an unusually rainy month—can show up downstream. Acting on these lessons closes the loop between practice, data, and improvement.
As a chemical manufacturer, we deal daily with the challenges and rewards of making specialty compounds like 3-pyridinecarboxylic acid, 6-chloro-4-ethoxy-. Market realities, regulatory evolution, and fast-moving technical demands keep our team sharp. Each production run and every troubleshooting call strengthens our confidence in what this molecule brings to pharmaceutical and fine chemical innovation. By refining production and staying connected to end-user needs, we continue building trust batch by batch, shipment by shipment.