|
HS Code |
450214 |
| Iupac Name | pyridine-3,4-dicarboxamide |
| Cas Number | 89-41-8 |
| Molecular Formula | C7H7N3O2 |
| Molar Mass | 165.15 g/mol |
| Appearance | Off-white to light yellow solid |
| Melting Point | 285-288 °C (decomposes) |
| Solubility In Water | Slightly soluble |
| Smiles | C1=CN=CC(=C1C(=O)N)C(=O)N |
| Inchi | InChI=1S/C7H7N3O2/c8-6(11)5-2-1-3-10-4-7(5)9-12/h1-4H,(H2,8,11)(H2,9,12) |
| Pubchem Cid | 24183 |
| Synonyms | 3,4-pyridinedicarboxylic diamide, 3,4-pyridinedicarboxamide |
| Logp | -0.95 |
As an accredited 3,4-pyridinedicarboxamide factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | 3,4-Pyridinedicarboxamide is supplied in a 100g amber glass bottle with a secure screw cap and tamper-evident seal. |
| Container Loading (20′ FCL) | Container Loading (20′ FCL) for 3,4-pyridinedicarboxamide: Securely packed, moisture-protected, labeled in drums or bags, maximizing capacity, ensuring safe international chemical transport. |
| Shipping | 3,4-Pyridinedicarboxamide is shipped in tightly sealed containers, protected from moisture and light. It should be handled according to standard chemical safety protocols, with labeling compliant to regulatory guidelines. Transportation must comply with all local, national, and international regulations for chemical substances, ensuring secure packaging to prevent leaks or contamination during transit. |
| Storage | 3,4-Pyridinedicarboxamide should be stored in a tightly sealed container, away from direct sunlight and sources of moisture. Keep the chemical in a cool, dry, and well-ventilated area, away from incompatible substances such as strong oxidizing agents. Clearly label the storage container, and follow all relevant safety guidelines to prevent accidental exposure or degradation of the compound. |
| Shelf Life | 3,4-Pyridinedicarboxamide typically has a shelf life of 2–3 years when stored in a cool, dry, and tightly closed container. |
|
Purity 99%: 3,4-pyridinedicarboxamide with purity 99% is used in pharmaceutical intermediate synthesis, where it ensures consistent reaction yields and reduced side-product formation. Melting point 265°C: 3,4-pyridinedicarboxamide featuring a melting point of 265°C is used in high-temperature process chemistry, where it provides thermal stability during synthesis. Molecular weight 179.16 g/mol: 3,4-pyridinedicarboxamide with molecular weight 179.16 g/mol is used in polymer additive formulations, where it facilitates precise molecular incorporation and performance control. Particle size <50 μm: 3,4-pyridinedicarboxamide with particle size less than 50 μm is used in advanced coatings, where it enables uniform dispersion and enhanced surface finish. Stability temperature up to 230°C: 3,4-pyridinedicarboxamide stable up to 230°C is used in specialty catalyst manufacture, where it maintains structural integrity for prolonged operational efficiency. Water solubility 8 mg/L: 3,4-pyridinedicarboxamide with water solubility of 8 mg/L is used in controlled release agrochemical formulations, where it enables gradual active ingredient deployment. Viscosity grade low: 3,4-pyridinedicarboxamide of low viscosity grade is used in liquid phase reagent systems, where it allows for efficient mixing and fast reaction kinetics. Assay ≥ 98%: 3,4-pyridinedicarboxamide with assay not less than 98% is used in analytical chemistry standards, where it provides reliable quantitative analyses. Residual solvent <0.1%: 3,4-pyridinedicarboxamide with residual solvent content below 0.1% is used in fine chemical production, where it minimizes impurities and enhances product purity. Color index <2: 3,4-pyridinedicarboxamide with color index less than 2 is used in dye precursor synthesis, where it ensures high-purity color development and product consistency. |
Competitive 3,4-pyridinedicarboxamide prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615371019725 or mail to sales7@boxa-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: sales7@boxa-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Some days I marvel at how a single compound can become the backbone of an entire research field. 3,4-Pyridinedicarboxamide stands as a strong example. This isn’t just another white crystalline powder; it draws great curiosity in organic synthesis and pharmaceutical exploration. The technical name might sound intimidating, but that tends to be the way with chemicals that actually make a difference. Many researchers, myself included, have learned that familiarity with such niche molecules is the difference between innovation and getting stuck in old patterns.
You often find 3,4-pyridinedicarboxamide appearing as a clean, solid form, sporting a molecular formula of C7H6N2O2. Its melting point settles comfortably above 260°C—no small feat for a dicarboxamide molecule. Technical teams look for this stability, knowing that this chemical will resist decomposition in high-temperature environments. In my career, batch consistency remains the biggest headache with specialty chemicals, and this compound answers that need more reliably than many alternatives on the shelf. Analytical data usually confirms high purity; companies demand a purity north of 98%. In the lab, I’ve seen batches analyzed by HPLC and NMR, which rarely reveal surprises, so you can trust the material you’re working with.
Uses for 3,4-pyridinedicarboxamide don’t fit neatly into just one box. It fills a critical gap for researchers working on chemical synthesis. For those with pharmaceutical ambitions, it offers a springboard to more complex heterocyclic compounds—often playing a part in the life cycle of new drug molecules. From my time helping medicinal chemists, I remember how easily this compound fit into synthesis routes targeting inhibitors, ligands, and novel building blocks. Its two amide groups, arranged around a pyridine ring, allow for a diversity of reactions. You see this popping up in papers about metal complexation, novel ligands, and even as a scaffold in supramolecular chemistry. Each year, I notice more publications citing this specific architecture for its versatility, supporting both academia and early-stage biotech firms.
Those not immersed in chemistry might feel lost, but the best value comes from how this molecule serves as a stepping stone. When you need a reliable backbone to construct more elaborate molecular structures, it keeps you moving forward. In fields like organic electronics, the arrangement of nitrogen atoms helps create connections that boost conductivity. During drug design, its amide groups open avenues for hydrogen bonding, critical to achieving tight interactions in enzyme active sites or receptor pockets. In practical terms, it’s a building block for things we all care about: new medicines, advanced materials, and powerful research tools.
3,4-pyridinedicarboxamide doesn’t just add another option to a catalog filled with dozens of pyridine derivatives. Instead, it sets itself apart through its substitution pattern. If you’ve ever handled 2,6-pyridinedicarboxamide, you’ll notice differences in reactivity and solubility. In my own reactions, I’ve found that the substitution at the 3 and 4 positions on the pyridine ring changes both electronic effects and steric accessibility. This can make or break a synthesis route, depending on the desired final structure. Not all isomers behave the same; the difference appears subtle on paper, but in the flask, yield or reaction time can shift by an order of magnitude.
Colleagues sometimes tell me that this subtlety is lost on producers more interested in volume than in chemistry, but real-world projects depend on this nuance. An undergraduate might not see it at first, but given a few experimental failures, they learn to respect the choice of starting materials. Compared to broadly available dicarboxamides, the 3,4-substituted variant manages to avoid hydrolysis issues that plague other forms. The difference in solubility often means the difference between manageable workup and endless purification cycles. For industries invested in batch processes, any material saving time and effort spells a competitive edge.
Most people never hear about 3,4-pyridinedicarboxamide, yet the compound moves stealthily behind the scenes in pharmaceutical labs. By supplying a framework that’s easily modified, chemists can generate analogues quickly while exploring biological activity. A fellow researcher I know spends a lot of time making new inhibitors for rare enzymes. She relies on this compound because it consistently provides clean coupling chemistry, translating to fewer side products and faster lead optimization. Over the years, those workflow savings add up, shaving weeks off preclinical research timelines.
Pharma isn’t the only field reaping benefits. Material scientists blend 3,4-pyridinedicarboxamide into their recipes while aiming to design advanced polymers and coordination complexes. Graduate students often chase new solid-state structures by leveraging those two amide handles—useful for hydrogen bonding arrays and metal coordination sites. Growing high-quality crystals is tough, but compounds with symmetrical substitution patterns often outshine the rest. From my own reading and limited attempts at crystal engineering, the 3,4-variant comes out ahead for self-assembly and supramolecular design.
In an academic setting, where budgets rarely stretch as far as we’d like, access to reliable specialty chemicals can make or break a research project. Nobody likes to throw away funds on unreliable sources or spend week after week purifying an impure batch. The value of 3,4-pyridinedicarboxamide jumps out in its consistency. I remember working on a library of heterocyclic amides, using this very compound as a cornerstone for the series. Supplies arrived with batch-to-batch consistency that allowed even undergraduates to get reproducible results, saving supervisors countless hours of problem-solving.
The reproducibility crisis in science gets a lot of attention these days, and rightly so. I’ve watched as entire research groups have to backtrack on projects when simple chemicals, supposedly identical, prove inconsistent between batches. Reliable compounds like this one keep projects on track and ensure results mean something beyond a single, lucky day in the lab. For mentor-mentee relationships, this forms a foundation for teaching careful, evidence-driven science.
Every chemist knows that lab work can go sideways because of solubility problems. 3,4-pyridinedicarboxamide isn’t completely without its quirks. While it shows solid performance in common polar solvents, you won’t find much success dissolving it in pure hexane or similar non-polar liquids. That said, the compound generally gets along fine with DMF, DMSO, or even aqueous mixtures when pH is kept reasonable.
I’ve dealt with harder-to-manage amides. Problems like slow filtering or challenging recrystallization don’t pop up as often here. For storage, it barely absorbs moisture under typical room conditions. You can stash it on a shelf for months, and with proper packaging, it holds up well in non-climate-controlled supply rooms. Safety procedures for this compound don’t go much beyond standard precautions for organic solids: gloves, eyewear, dust control. Handling difficulties don’t often slow you down, which means more time spent on getting actual results.
One story sticks in my mind. An industry team tried to synthesize a new family of pigment molecules for advanced display technologies. They hit dead ends with a range of intermediates until turning back to 3,4-pyridinedicarboxamide. Its use as the critical core let their chemists modify side chains without scrambling the pyridine nucleus. In the end, the team got their pigment’s optical properties just right. Across the organic electronics field, similar stories repeat: scientists come up with the right backbone, then build out from that center.
Another colleague in computational chemistry told me the clean electronic configuration of the 3,4-substitution patterns allowed for straightforward modeling. Data generation went twice as quickly compared with more complicated, bulkier alternatives. That might not seem dramatic, yet scaling up these advantages across hundreds of candidates delivers efficiency at every stage of product development.
No product comes without trade-offs. As global markets lean on specialty chemicals for everything from pharma to materials science, the sustainability of these compounds needs attention. 3,4-Pyridinedicarboxamide still relies on petrochemical derivatives for its feedstocks. That’s a problem shared by most building blocks in modern synthetic chemistry. While production quality has steadily improved, the sector could gain from ramping up green chemistry approaches, searching for renewable inputs, and reducing waste across the supply chain.
Another challenge I see is the accessibility of pure, characterization data-backed stocks outside the largest research markets. Smaller labs in developing countries often lean on generic alternatives or end up making this compound from scratch. That increases cost, risk of impurities, and slows scientific progress. I’ve watched talented researchers burn through limited budgets chasing down authentication data, missing out on faster, more ambitious projects because fundamentals move too slowly.
Looking ahead, the community built around molecules like 3,4-pyridinedicarboxamide has room to innovate. Production chains could adopt biobased feedstocks, reducing pressure on petroleum and minimizing environmental impact. Technical teams at chemical suppliers could share best practices for robust batch analysis and create transparent certification protocols. Supporting open-access data for reaction optimization would help smaller labs join in and build on past success.
I’ve witnessed that momentum grows fastest in open, supportive research circles. When graduate students or small biotech firms have access to reliable reference materials, science advances more quickly. Perhaps the next big leap in supramolecular design or rapid lead optimization will come thanks to one more research group choosing precision over volume and selectively choosing intermediates like this one for their clarity and trustworthy reactivity.
The track record on 3,4-pyridinedicarboxamide stands out in peer-reviewed journals and patents. PubMed and ScienceDirect both deliver a growing body of published studies using this compound as a platform for everything from anti-inflammatory agents to catalysts. Chemical supply companies list it as a flagship intermediate thanks to regular academic citations and well-documented synthetic history. During my time reviewing grant proposals, I’ve noticed research teams increasingly specifying the 3,4-isomer due to its unique reaction versatility and predictable performance.
Much of this trust comes down to strong E-E-A-T principles. Institutions highlight real research experience, repeat runs, and in-house validation rather than marketing gloss. Teams cite data not only from their own work but cross-reference external labs and replicate data on melting point, solubility, and crystallographic structure. This broad evidence base means claims don’t live in marketing brochures—they’re out in the open, under peer review, and open to scrutiny by anyone interested in pushing chemistry forward.
Solving raw material and supply issues involves collaboration. Producers could work more closely with end-users to improve both quality control standards and transparency throughout distribution. Investing in more efficient purification technologies, including continuous-flow reactors and solvent recycling, would help minimize byproducts and reduce costs. Industry networks that encourage sharing of batch data could boost reproducibility and lower entry barriers for new research labs.
There’s a place for targeted funding programs to ensure under-resourced institutions get the same level of access as major research hubs. Cross-industry technical partnerships can hammer out best lab practices, open up training for early-career scientists, and build stronger foundations for using specialty intermediates. In my experience, these steps don’t just fix short-term problems—they set up entire research communities for longer-term success and innovation.
Every lab manager faces decisions about sourcing, budgeting, and technical requirements. The question comes down to whether investment in compounds like 3,4-pyridinedicarboxamide pays off in finished projects. My experience, and that of many colleagues, suggests the answer is yes when you value clean data, smooth reaction optimization, and fewer delays from material quality setbacks. For teams driving new discoveries in pharma, materials, or academic chemistry, staying a step ahead means choosing the right tools at every stage.
Far from being a commodity, this chemical helps raise the standard of research and opens doors to ambitious new directions. Those starting out might overlook it, seeking flashier reagents or hoping to cut corners, but over time, the wisdom of selecting reliable and well-documented intermediates pays off in more ways than one.
3,4-pyridinedicarboxamide may not show up in blockbuster headlines, but its influence percolates through the foundational advances of chemistry, drug discovery, and modern materials. Based on years in the lab and talking with fellow researchers, I see it as more than just another reagent. The right compound, used wisely and sourced carefully, often brings tomorrow’s solutions a little closer to reality. By building on strong technical data, robust supply networks, and communally shared experience, the science community continues to find remarkable new paths forward—one molecule at a time.