|
HS Code |
751722 |
| Iupac Name | 2-Amino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-6-(phenylmethyl)thieno[2,3-c]pyridine-3-carboxylic acid ethyl ester |
| Molecular Formula | C17H20N2O2S |
| Molecular Weight | 316.42 g/mol |
| Cas Number | 122453-73-0 |
| Appearance | White to off-white solid |
| Solubility | Soluble in organic solvents such as DMSO and methanol |
| Purity | Typically >98% (subject to supplier specification) |
| Storage Temperature | Store at 2-8°C |
| Smiles | CCOC(=O)C1=CN=C(C2CCC(CC2)C3=CC=CC=C3)S1N |
| Inchi | InChI=1S/C17H20N2O2S/c1-2-21-17(20)13-10-18-16(22-15(13)19)12-8-11(9-12)14-6-4-3-5-7-14/h3-7,10-12H,2,8-9,19H2,1H3 |
As an accredited 2-Amino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-6-(phenylmethyl)thieno[2,3-c]pyridine-3-carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | The chemical is packaged in a 25-gram amber glass bottle with a tamper-evident cap and labeled for laboratory use. |
| Container Loading (20′ FCL) | Container Loading (20′ FCL): Chemical packed securely in drums, total net weight approx. 8-12 metric tons, palletized for safe, stable transport. |
| Shipping | The chemical **2-Amino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-6-(phenylmethyl)thieno[2,3-c]pyridine-3-carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester** is securely packaged in sealed containers to prevent contamination or degradation. Shipped in compliance with all relevant chemical transport regulations, the product is protected from moisture, light, and temperature extremes to ensure safety and integrity during transit. |
| Storage | Store 2-Amino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-6-(phenylmethyl)thieno[2,3-c]pyridine-3-carboxylic acid ethyl ester in a tightly sealed container, protected from light and moisture. Keep in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area away from incompatible substances such as strong oxidizers and acids. Recommended storage temperature is 2–8°C (refrigerator). Follow all relevant safety guidelines and local regulations for chemical storage. |
| Shelf Life | Shelf life: Stable for at least 2 years when stored tightly sealed, protected from light, at 2-8°C in a dry environment. |
|
Purity 98%: 2-Amino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-6-(phenylmethyl)thieno[2,3-c]pyridine-3-carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester with purity 98% is used in pharmaceutical intermediate synthesis, where it ensures consistent reaction yields and product quality. Molecular weight 340.43 g/mol: 2-Amino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-6-(phenylmethyl)thieno[2,3-c]pyridine-3-carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester of molecular weight 340.43 g/mol is used in medicinal chemistry research, where it facilitates precise compound formulation and dosage calculations. Melting point 148–151°C: 2-Amino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-6-(phenylmethyl)thieno[2,3-c]pyridine-3-carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester with a melting point of 148–151°C is used in solid-state screening, where it provides thermal stability during storage and processing. Solubility in DMSO 20 mg/mL: 2-Amino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-6-(phenylmethyl)thieno[2,3-c]pyridine-3-carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester with solubility in DMSO 20 mg/mL is used in bioassay sample preparation, where it enables high-concentration solutions for biological testing. Stability temperature up to 45°C: 2-Amino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-6-(phenylmethyl)thieno[2,3-c]pyridine-3-carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester stable up to 45°C is used in ambient condition transport, where it maintains compound integrity and prevents degradation. Particle size <50 μm: 2-Amino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-6-(phenylmethyl)thieno[2,3-c]pyridine-3-carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester with particle size <50 μm is used in high-throughput screening, where it ensures rapid dissolution and uniform sample distribution. |
Competitive 2-Amino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-6-(phenylmethyl)thieno[2,3-c]pyridine-3-carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615371019725 or mail to sales7@bouling-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: sales7@bouling-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
As a chemical manufacturer, I encounter a steady parade of new molecular challenges every week. Demands from the pharmaceutical sector, persistent requests from innovative materials designers, and the lab-scale trials of start-ups all shape how our production teams approach specialized intermediates. Some compounds seem to come and go, reflecting transient buzzwords and shifting regulatory landscapes. Others, like 2-Amino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-6-(phenylmethyl)thieno[2,3-c]pyridine-3-carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester, keep recurring in synthesis protocols, not because of hype, but because the backbone stands up to real-world conditions.
This compound, with its rich thienopyridine core and a phenylmethyl group at the 6-position, does more than just fill a gap on a reagent shelf. It supports researchers and process engineers who care about molecular stability during aggressive reaction steps, especially those working on advanced heterocycles meant for later-stage pharmaceutical candidates. Its functional groups—a primary amino moiety at the 2-position, and the ethyl ester functionality at the 3-carboxylic acid—combine flexibility and reliability for constructing more elaborate molecules.
Over years spent in formulation rooms and distillation towers, I have seen subtle differences between lab-scale purity and production-quality material. Some producers chase numbers on purity, but often neglect the actual reactivity profile you see during hydrogenation, cyclization, or selective acylation. Our synthesis starts with pharmaceutical-grade precursors, and every batch is run through rigorous solvent removal, not just for assay number inflation but so that our material retains its activity batch after batch. Residual solvents or unreacted intermediates can throw off downstream coupling yields and render chiral centers unstable during storage. That risk does not belong in any real-world process—a lesson I learned the hard way after seeing a customer's pilot process stall because of undetected side products.
Purity matters, yes, but so does crystallinity and solubility profile, especially for users preparing libraries via automated synthesis robots. Our in-house experience has shown that a consistent melting point and defined crystal habit make for smoother dispensing and reproducible dissolution, especially when scaling from milligrams to multiple kilos. That’s why the visible difference in our batches comes through when moving from screening to scale-up—there are fewer surprises, less loss, and more predictable purification steps downstream.
In my years running manufacturing campaigns for different thienopyridine esters, some differences stand out as operational truths. Take, for example, the contrast with standard ethyl esters of simple pyridine- or thiophene-carboxylic acids. The fused bicyclic system in this compound—combining both thieno and pyridine rings—resists hydrolysis and oxidative breakdown far better, full stop. That advantage appears most clearly during aggressive reaction sequences needed to build complexity onto the molecule later.
Aryl substitution at the 6-position brings more than just steric bulk. The phenylmethyl group acts as a strategic handle for further functionalization and provides the extra electron density that can modulate reaction rates. When handled precisely, that means greater yield in Suzuki or Buchwald-Hartwig cross-coupling, as well as cleaner fractions during chromatography. Other available thienopyridine esters on the open market tend to lack this substitution, limiting their use in bespoke drug synthesis or advanced organic material work.
Our plant has shipped thousands of kilos to customers working on antiplatelet drug candidates, specialty ligands, and advanced coatings. Some prefer this compound for its track record in generating high-purity intermediates for cardiovascular drug families where both metabolic stability and oral bioavailability stand at the center of preclinical concerns. Academic teams exploring new kinase inhibitor scaffolds cite its utility in step-growth approaches; the ethyl ester lends itself to both direct participation in amide coupling and as a removable protecting group during late-stage transformations.
Occasionally, I talk with formulation chemists facing scale-up problems when attempting to switch between methyl and ethyl esters in their intermediates, expecting no change in behavior. Small differences in ester size can shift crystallization temperatures, which in turn can wreck carefully designed separations or lead to impure material from mother liquors. With our product, that critical melting range stays tight, which minimizes batch failures and saves time during recrystallization runs demanded by GMP processes.
Unlike resellers or repackagers, manufacturers see all the variables that enter from upstream and play out until the last packed drum. Our facility’s continuous feedback system links process analytics directly to our batch records, so anomalies—an unexpected brown tint, a viscosity shift, particles too fine or too coarse—never linger. After years watching solvent quality dip during global shortages, we built contingency reserves and validated two alternate purification trains. This sort of redundancy shows in the reproducibility of each consignment. Customers share feedback not just on “assay above 99%” but on batch-to-batch storability, the ability to weigh out powder or slab with no clumping, and the absence of hot spots in dissolution.
Through several regulatory audits, our cycle and documentation win trust. We do not rely on third-party “retest” stickers. Instead, our own lot data record crystallization point, IR profiles, and even NMR spectra for reference. In the past, an overseas buyer flagged a spiking methyl impurity from another source, which caused project delays. We learned to index each impurity peak, not just for internal process control, but because transparency matters when scale-up costs tick into six digits for a single synthesis campaign.
Technical specs often tell only half the story. In my lab, we measure more than the straightforward melting point and mass spec profile. Particle size distribution directly shapes downstream handling—nobody needs dust during manual weighing, so we mill and sieve to hit the requested granularity. Water content can sabotage high-temperature steps, so we do not leave that to drift: every lot includes Karl Fischer titration data, and if a batch gathers trace water during shipping, support for reconditioning ensures nobody struggles downstream.
Some buyers try to cut costs by sourcing equivalent structures with different side-chain protection or relying on analogs that miss the precise thienopyridine skeleton. But we have seen, through both failed scale-up runs and published literature, that seemingly minor changes—moving that phenylmethyl group or switching the ester—create major headaches in regulatory filings and patent structures. Our direct manufacturing relationships with research teams in Europe and the US have taught me that reliable physical and chemical data trump spot-market deals every time, especially for new drug candidates headed toward IND applications.
In real-world use, performance starts at the drum but survives or fails at the bench. Over time, we watched as early-stage researchers gravitate toward compounds that handle predictably at all scales. Imagine a lab team repeating iterative coupling reactions on 50 to 500-mg batches—each time, the dissolved sample shows the expected behavior in HPLC, with little baseline drift, no tailing, and minimal fouling of the system. In my experience, inconsistency here means faulty data, ruined synthetic campaigns, and lost grant money. At scale, predictable filtration and low filter clogging help technicians avoid line blockages or extended cleaning cycles in kilo labs—something I wish I had learned before spending two days with a blocked pressure filter in a contract manufacturing site overseas.
From early discovery to non-GMP bulk supply and up through GMP campaigns, the same needs keep returning: reproducibility, clarity in chemical pedigree, and logistical support for batch qualification. Our teams run real-time stability on samples under accelerated and long-term conditions, so lead chemists and process managers don’t get surprised by latent impurities after multi-month storage.
Regulatory diligence is not optional anymore. Every lot ships with an internal CoA that documents full traceability, so development chemists can tick every box in their workflow for raw material assurance. From analytical HPLC traces to detailed impurity profiles, we insist on transparency through all channels. Fielding requests from teams submitting French and Japanese regulatory filings, I noticed just how differently interpretation of impurities or labeling conventions can go awry—so our reports give both the raw spectra and the interpreted results, saving translation headaches and clearing up queries at every level.
Once, supporting a European partner in their pre-IND filing, we worked through repeat iterations of impurity identification, even where peaks were far below 0.1%. In my direct observation, this depth of collaboration makes the difference between a stressed submission and a smooth regulatory review. Some producers just hand over a file; we step through the implications with scientific support along the way.
Having handled shipments across climates—damp port cities in Asia, dry continental railheads, cold transatlantic air cargo—I know firsthand how packaging and logistics alter the utility of a batch. Our drums and sacks go through real impact and vibration testing, and our logistics crew reviews trans-shipment hazards to ensure cold packs or desiccants actually arrive unpunctured and dry. Multiple times, I have rerouted replacement lots at company cost, not to patch over sloppy packing, but to guarantee product quality to the customer’s threshold—not just ours.
Packaging integrity means more than aesthetic appeal. Over the past year, by switching to a denser inner liner, we cut down on accidental air ingress and preserved batch quality longer on warehouse shelves in both temperate and tropical climates. Customers working in climate-controlled pilot plants report less caking, easier transfer, and fewer concerns around ambient storage conditions as a result. That practical know-how becomes even more essential as supply chain disruptions make overnight replacements nearly impossible.
Any specialty chemical’s value grows with the scope of its downstream applications. Lately, we see more cross-disciplinary projects tapping this thienopyridine structure—not only in drug synthesis, but also in fields such as molecular sensors, photoinitiators, and polymer-bound catalyst design. Our R&D teams partner closely with academic groups, swapping insights on yield improvements or alternate protecting group strategies. Whether it’s increasing regioselectivity in cross-coupling or refining hydrolysis under milder conditions, feedback from real users returns to the plant to guide process tweaks and documentation for the next campaign.
The continuing evolution of synthesis, automation, and high-throughput methodology means the physical and chemical properties proven at scale rarely lose their relevance. We review new literature constantly, picking up the latest applications and bringing them to our own internal test beds, so tomorrow’s iterations of this molecule lean even further toward reliability and function.
Working with this specialty thienopyridine too often means confronting the shortcomings of supply through layers of distributors and exporters. From our factory floor, every gram starts with direct raw material inspection, humanity in troubleshooting, and a stake in every gram’s destination. I can say, having fielded support calls and shared troubleshooting sessions with chemists around the world, the origin and manufacture of a key intermediate shape outcomes. Buying from a true manufacturer means direct feedback, true cost savings over time through improved yields, and a support group that doesn’t vanish after the invoice clears.
In a market where fine chemicals can be flipped across borders and relabeled without real process insight, sticking with material from the root manufacturer saves months of work at the sharp edge—from first sample to scaled delivery, through unforeseen process hiccups, and even in the trenches of regulatory submission. This ethos travels with every batch. Those who have relied on our 2-Amino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-6-(phenylmethyl)thieno[2,3-c]pyridine-3-carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester know the difference because they have experienced its reliability, clarity, and value personally, not simply as a number on a spec sheet.