|
HS Code |
328262 |
| Iupac Name | 2-Amino-3-nitro-6-[(4-fluorobenzyl)amino]pyridine |
| Molecular Formula | C12H11FN4O2 |
| Appearance | Yellow to orange solid |
| Solubility | Slightly soluble in DMSO, insoluble in water |
| Smiles | Nc1nc(cc(n1)NCC2=CC=C(C=C2)F)[N+](=O)[O-] |
| Inchi | InChI=1S/C12H11FN4O2/c13-10-3-1-8(2-4-10)7-15-12-9(14)11(17(18)19)5-6-16-12/h1-6,15-16H,7H2,(H2,14,16) |
| Storage Conditions | Store in a cool, dry place away from light |
| Purity | Typically >98% (depends on supplier) |
| Synonyms | 6-[(4-Fluorobenzyl)amino]-2-amino-3-nitropyridine |
As an accredited 2-Amino-3-nitro-6-(4-fluorobenzylamino)pyridine factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | The chemical is packaged in a 25-gram amber glass bottle, sealed with a tamper-evident cap, and labeled with safety and identification details. |
| Container Loading (20′ FCL) | Loaded in a 20′ FCL, securely packed in sealed drums, labeled for chemical safety, with appropriate ventilation and temperature controls. |
| Shipping | The chemical 2-Amino-3-nitro-6-(4-fluorobenzylamino)pyridine is shipped in a tightly sealed container, clearly labeled and packaged in accordance with international hazardous materials transport regulations. It is protected from light, moisture, and physical damage, with required documentation and safety data sheets included. Shipment is handled by certified carriers specializing in chemical logistics. |
| Storage | Store **2-Amino-3-nitro-6-(4-fluorobenzylamino)pyridine** in a tightly sealed container, in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area, away from direct sunlight, incompatible substances (such as strong oxidizers or acids), and moisture. Use secondary containment to prevent spills. Avoid sources of ignition. Label clearly, and restrict access to trained personnel. Personal protective equipment (PPE) should be used during handling. |
| Shelf Life | 2-Amino-3-nitro-6-(4-fluorobenzylamino)pyridine typically has a shelf life of 2 years when stored in a cool, dry place. |
|
Purity 98%: 2-Amino-3-nitro-6-(4-fluorobenzylamino)pyridine with 98% purity is used in pharmaceutical intermediate synthesis, where it ensures high-yield and low impurity formation. Melting Point 162°C: 2-Amino-3-nitro-6-(4-fluorobenzylamino)pyridine at a melting point of 162°C is used in solid-phase organic reactions, where it provides thermal stability during processing. Molecular Weight 263.23 g/mol: 2-Amino-3-nitro-6-(4-fluorobenzylamino)pyridine with a molecular weight of 263.23 g/mol is used in medicinal chemistry research, where it allows precise molecular modeling for drug design. Particle Size <20 μm: 2-Amino-3-nitro-6-(4-fluorobenzylamino)pyridine with particle size below 20 μm is used in formulation of fine chemical reagents, where it improves solubility and dispersion uniformity. Storage Stability 24 months: 2-Amino-3-nitro-6-(4-fluorobenzylamino)pyridine with 24-month storage stability is used in reference standard libraries, where it ensures long-term reliability for analytical quality control. |
Competitive 2-Amino-3-nitro-6-(4-fluorobenzylamino)pyridine prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615371019725 or mail to sales7@bouling-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: sales7@bouling-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Every day, we walk through production halls filled with the distinct scents of chemistry in action. Here, among the hundreds of syntheses running across our lines, few capture the kind of consistent attention that 2-Amino-3-nitro-6-(4-fluorobenzylamino)pyridine demands. This compound, known in our manufacturing shorthand as ANFBAP, stands out for the versatility it brings to advanced organic synthesis, specifically where precise nitrogen positioning and functional group tolerance matter most.
Years spent perfecting this compound have acquainted us with the details others may overlook. From the exact depth of color at different purification stages, to the subtle differences in crystallization patterns depending on solvent systems, every batch teaches something new for those paying attention. In the plant, reliable quality comes through hands-on vigilance. Our technicians know the scent of a pure product, the telltale signs of successful reduction, and the nuances in texture that precede optimal dryness. We watch for these because they signal success not just for that day’s lot, but for every downstream scientist, formulator, and developer who will transform our product further.
You’re probably looking for stats and figures. One thing about ANFBAP—the depth and clarity of our product directly reflect the effort spent purifying it. Each batch comes off the line with a controlled melting range, expected moisture content (we measure this promptly after vacuum drying), and stringent limits on chloride and residual metals. Our detection limits for common process impurities have tightened over the years, thanks to investments in advanced HPLC and GC-MS gear that started out as “nice to have” and became “can’t function without.”
We monitor particle size closely, not as a box-checking exercise, but because small inconsistencies during filtration or drying can have outsized effects later. Solubility has also cropped up as a point of inquiry—our technical staff regularly assists R&D chemists who want to tailor process conditions for specific downstream reactions. The lessons we draw from ongoing feedback often lead to subtle adjustments. We’ve seen solvent traces behave differently in hot and humid Augusts, calling for tweaks to drying cycles that only come from years in the trenches with the material.
No single product line fits all, but some materials spark more adaptation across industries than others. ANFBAP’s amine and nitro functionalities catch the eyes of teams working in pharmaceutical intermediates, specialty dye research, and ligand development for catalysis. Direct feedback from users about the need for consistency in reactivity led us to refine a couple of purification techniques. Removing trace amounts of certain by-products can mean the difference between a clean coupling reaction or troubleshooting failed scale-ups.
Working with real customers—whether they’re synthesizing complex molecules for drug discovery or screening derivatives for materials science—teaches us the less obvious importance of robust logistics. Short lead times and reliable delivery aren’t luxuries, they’re necessities. Process consistency matters. Shipping ANFBAP without delays and ensuring the right container lining prevents unwanted contamination, especially with aromatic amines and fluorinated groups at play. We hear routinely from teams grateful for the absence of unwanted background interference, saving days that would otherwise go to reworking or extra purification.
Plenty of products resemble ANFBAP, sure. But minor shifts in structure—like moving a nitro group or swapping out an aryl substituent—change everything downstream. Our production staff has watched competitors send out related pyridines with varying levels of side products. Over time, we’ve learned exactly which purification choices match which end uses. Some customers care more about optical clarity for analytics, others target maximum reactivity.
Differentiation also means accounting for the unique pain points our clients share back. Older batches from other sources have arrived semi-oxidized, requiring rework even before use. We listened, then adjusted storage and sealing processes, reducing air exposure between drying and final packing. This goes beyond technical specs—there’s pride in sending out a perfectly free-flowing powder that doesn’t clump, pick up moisture, or leave oily residues. Seeing that difference at unpacking can mean smoother progress on a project that’s burning costly R&D hours.
Synthesizing and isolating ANFBAP is not so straightforward as adding reagents in the right order and waiting for the endpoint. Real success begins long before sealing the first flask. Sourcing raw materials with reliable purity protects against foreign-metal catalysis. Tracing lot numbers all the way back minimizes uncertainty. Over the years, we’ve upgraded supplier selection protocols, maintaining a list of trusted partners who actually pick up the phone when urgent situations arise.
At the heart of our workflow, a strong technical team makes the crucial call between further purification by column chromatography or crystallization. Many times, what gets sent out as a small pilot batch ends up evolving our large-scale process. A direct line between the technical bench and the operations team has saved hours—sometimes days—by immediately correcting something that feels off during a mid-synthesis sample draw. Temperature ramps and hold times, mixing speeds, the pressure setting on filters—no two runs look totally identical, but the final product does.
Scrutiny never ends at shipping. Tracking technology now lets our teams flag environmental anomalies in transit. If a shipment crosses a sketchy route with high humidity, alerts prompt extra checks before final release. Stuff like this isn’t visible in technical data sheets, but it impacts the compound’s utility once it lands in a research or manufacturing environment.
After a couple of years’ data, it’s obvious which process tweaks protect batch-to-batch reproducibility. Overhead agitators replaced older mixing systems, and finer vacuum drying lines came online to maximize product integrity. One lesson—too-high drying temperatures led to unwanted coloration and a slight shift in product mass. Tweaking this, and capping air ingress with argon, preserved both purity and stability. You don’t learn these until you’ve personally run enough syntheses to see them go right, and wrong.
We keep ongoing stability tests running, not because it’s a regulatory checkbox, but because we’ve learned from clients who occasionally store materials for months before use. These trials tell us how the product ages, any risks of demixing, or how certain packaging choices impact shelf life. Some batches underperform on color and solubility if they absorb too much ambient moisture—a detail flagged by a long-term pharmaceutical partner in the South. Lessons like that change both testing protocols and packaging, fast.
Routine calibration of our analytical tools remains non-negotiable. HPLC profiles, mass spectra, Karl Fischer moisture checks, and trace metal screening all find their way into daily conversations between QC and production leads. Trust in your raw numbers matters a lot more when the next process step may cost thousands in reagents and weeks in labor.
Many requests come from project chemists looking for answers that run deeper than what fits on a datasheet. Here, years making ANFBAP pay off. For instance, some partners require especially low levels of base-metal residue. Not every plant has the trace analysis ability to guarantee sub-ppm levels, but trialing several filtration media, including high-performance silica and carbon, got us there. Since then, we expanded this practice, discovering that the same approach improved other products in the same class.
Applying feedback loops builds visibility. More often, we collaborate on custom particle sizes or unique solvent residues to accommodate oddball synthetic techniques. Such dialog may begin as a single substitution, but quickly grows into revised SOPs and staff retraining. We publish ongoing research on new purification ideas, connecting with universities and research consortia to stay ahead of application needs.
Recent years have pulled demand for ANFBAP into both established pharmaceutical projects and fresh forays into fluorescent dye applications. Each new direction asks different things of our plant: one requires the cleanest product possible to avoid fouling enzymatic screens, another wants larger lots for scale-up and pilot testing. We adapt, revisiting every process control point, always with the understanding that a slip in quality impacts real, ongoing experiments.
Working at the source, you see plenty of claims about synthetic shortcuts, ultra-pure isolations, or instant deliveries. Reality runs on tireless staff, experienced operators, and investment in both tools and training. Shaving a couple of hours from filtration looks good on a chart, but cutting corners on washing or solvent exchange leaves your customer sorting out debris or discoloration. That risk hits especially hard on aromatic compounds where trace color often signals trace contaminants.
Confidence in batch-to-batch repeatability does not come from hope. Each time we certify a shipment, it’s on the strength of rigorous data and human diligence. Every hiccup becomes a lesson, and every success stems from active monitoring, correctable procedures, and open communication with the people actually handling the compound next. Hearing about a failed coupling, or contaminant spots on an HPLC trace, feeds directly into process reviews and corrective actions.
Years dealing with aromatic amines and nitro compounds encourage respect for safe handling and thoughtful waste management. Standing at the discharge port of a reactor, you notice quickly how low-boiling solvents, used for washing and extraction, pile up fast. Implementing solvent recycling caught on early, shaving both emissions and costs. What began as a cost-saving pilot now features as a showcase example in our environmental compliance program.
Our new filtration system cut solid-waste output per batch, and installation of vapor recovery systems halved volatile air emissions compared to older processes. Employees now participate in monthly feedback sessions both to flag improvement areas and to share practical wisdom—what works for small-lot syntheses often scales up without hassle, given the right attitude and attention to detail.
Market changes often shake up past routines. Supply shortages years back taught us the value of redundant raw material sourcing. Extra documentation now trails each incoming lot, traced forward to every finished batch. We share real-time process data with trusted partners working on modifications or alternatives. Already, this transparency helped one collaborator catch an incompatibility with their new catalyst before it cost them time and money.
Digital transformation reshapes daily routines in the manufacturing plant. Automated logs, barcode tracking, and on-the-fly process trend charts have cut routine errors and boosted uptime. All this tech still depends on watchful technicians who know when an instrument’s telling the truth or when to double-check a suspicious reading.
Every new partnership yields direct stories about progress blocked by unreliable materials. Some developers recount past batches with unexpected colors or incomplete reactivity. Delayed timelines hurt both production and commercial plans—a reminder that the manufacturing difference shows up fastest in the hands of those putting compounds to use.
Clear, open channels allow users to flag everything from packaging quirks (static-prone, difficult-to-open canisters) to subtle changes in odor. Adjusting to those suggestions improves what we send out next. Today’s batch wins tomorrow’s renewal—this reality drives our willingness to listen, refine, and adjust.
The feedback loop doesn’t stop with chemistry. Questions about shelf stability, non-standard documentation, or certificate timings sharpen our responsiveness. Large pharma partners report tighter QC requirements than ever, so documentation practices evolve to meet not just today’s but also tomorrow’s audit requests.
New markets for ANFBAP stretch beyond pharmacy and specialty dyes, moving into electronics and advanced agricultural chemistry. Adjusting synthesis routes to meet new safety and purity profiles means going back to fundamental process design. Sometimes, a simple change—like slower solvent addition or prolonged reduction—improves yield and narrows side-product profiles. These aren’t one-off adjustments, but responses tested, trialed, and confirmed through repeated production runs.
Each time a new client requests larger volumes or new specifications, it cues retraining for plant staff. Rehearsals make sure everyone can identify both the right appearance and the warning signs of process drift. The result: more secure delivery timelines, fewer headaches, and happier customers pushing technical frontiers with a reliable input.
From our position at the source, documentation goes deeper than compliance. Auditors occasionally pick up subtle process deviations that seem trivial but prompt thorough reviews. Keeping every process revision logged and justification annotated isn’t a paperwork exercise, but a way to protect users—especially in tightly regulated fields like active pharmaceutical ingredients.
Improvements suggested by real audits often filter into broader facility practice. We maintain regular training on both new global requirements and hard-earned local lessons to avoid the kind of compliance blindspots that can undermine an entire application.
The journey with ANFBAP is continuous. Anyone inside a chemical manufacturing plant knows better than to treat specifications alone as the whole picture. The trust end-users place in our material draws on history, accountability, and repeat performance. Each shipment reflects the combined labor of process chemists, compliance teams, operators, and logistics staff who pour their attention into every detail.
Looking ahead, the ongoing partnership with scientific and commercial teams—combined with our willingness to change processes, test new methods, and document every lesson—guarantees that ANFBAP will keep meeting the evolving standards of quality and utility that demanding sectors require.