|
HS Code |
815550 |
| Chemical Name | 2,6-dihydroxy-4-methyl-3-pyridine-carbonitrile |
| Molecular Formula | C7H6N2O2 |
| Cas Number | 13922-41-3 |
| Appearance | White to off-white solid |
| Melting Point | 205-210°C |
| Solubility In Water | Slightly soluble |
| Pka | Approx. 9.6 (first hydroxyl group, estimated) |
| Smiles | CC1=NC(=C(C(=C1O)O)C#N) |
| Inchi | InChI=1S/C7H6N2O2/c1-4-2-6(11)7(10)5(3-8)9-4/h2,10-11H,1H3 |
| Storage Conditions | Store in a cool, dry place; tightly closed container |
As an accredited 2,6-dihydroxy-4-methyl-3-pyridine-carbonitrile factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | White plastic bottle with blue screw cap, holds 100 grams. Labeled with chemical name, formula, hazard symbols, batch number, and supplier details. |
| Container Loading (20′ FCL) | 20′ FCL container typically loads 12–14MT of 2,6-dihydroxy-4-methyl-3-pyridine-carbonitrile, packed in 25kg fiber drums or bags. |
| Shipping | 2,6-Dihydroxy-4-methyl-3-pyridine-carbonitrile should be shipped in tightly sealed containers, protected from moisture and light. Use appropriate hazard labeling. Transport under dry, cool conditions, and comply with all local regulations regarding hazardous or chemical substances. Avoid contact with incompatible materials and ensure documentation accompanies the shipment for safe handling and identification. |
| Storage | Store **2,6-dihydroxy-4-methyl-3-pyridine-carbonitrile** in a tightly sealed container, in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area away from incompatible substances such as strong oxidizing agents. Protect from light and moisture. Use appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when handling. Clearly label the container, and follow all relevant chemical safety regulations for storage and disposal. |
| Shelf Life | 2,6-Dihydroxy-4-methyl-3-pyridine-carbonitrile should be stored in a cool, dry place; shelf life is typically 2–3 years. |
|
Purity 98%: 2,6-dihydroxy-4-methyl-3-pyridine-carbonitrile with 98% purity is used in pharmaceutical intermediate synthesis, where high purity ensures minimal byproduct formation. Melting Point 210°C: 2,6-dihydroxy-4-methyl-3-pyridine-carbonitrile with a melting point of 210°C is used in active ingredient formulation, where thermal stability allows for robust processing conditions. Particle Size <25 μm: 2,6-dihydroxy-4-methyl-3-pyridine-carbonitrile with particle size below 25 μm is used in fine chemical production, where smaller particles facilitate rapid dissolution and reaction rates. Moisture Content <0.2%: 2,6-dihydroxy-4-methyl-3-pyridine-carbonitrile with moisture content less than 0.2% is used in catalyst manufacturing, where low moisture increases shelf-life and reactivity. Stability Temperature up to 180°C: 2,6-dihydroxy-4-methyl-3-pyridine-carbonitrile with stability up to 180°C is used in polymer modification processes, where thermal resistance supports high-temperature operations. HPLC Purity 99%: 2,6-dihydroxy-4-methyl-3-pyridine-carbonitrile with HPLC purity of 99% is used in cosmetic active ingredient development, where high analytical purity promotes consistent product performance. Assay ≥ 99.5%: 2,6-dihydroxy-4-methyl-3-pyridine-carbonitrile with assay of at least 99.5% is used in laboratory reagent preparation, where high assay value ensures experimental accuracy. Residual Solvent <0.05%: 2,6-dihydroxy-4-methyl-3-pyridine-carbonitrile with residual solvent content below 0.05% is used in electronic material synthesis, where low residuals improve electrical characteristics. |
Competitive 2,6-dihydroxy-4-methyl-3-pyridine-carbonitrile prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615371019725 or mail to sales7@boxa-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: sales7@boxa-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Many years on the production floor working with pyridine derivatives have provided a clear view of the details that matter. In the case of 2,6-dihydroxy-4-methyl-3-pyridine-carbonitrile, each batch reveals how crucial process control is. Even small changes in starting material purity or crystallization conditions show up in the material’s performance during end-use evaluation. This compound does not forgive sloppy handling or half-hearted quality checks. We understand that, because we have dealt with those mistakes and fixed them at their source, not just on paper.
Manufacturing this compound means dealing with strict demands for cleanliness and stability. Airborne moisture, trace acid or base fumes, or mechanical shearing during drying put subtle but real pressure on both the consistency and shelf life of the final product. Our process looks beyond the reaction vessel—every step, down to the choice of packaging liner, traces back to years of hands-on troubleshooting. That background shapes how we talk about the product with customers and colleagues alike.
2,6-Dihydroxy-4-methyl-3-pyridine-carbonitrile pops up most often as an intermediate on paper, but its value is more than that single word suggests. Laboratories and plants alike use it in synthesis chains that target pharmaceuticals, particularly for active ingredient backbones which need robust aromatic cores with well-matched substituents. The hydroxy groups at the 2 and 6 positions provide strong sites for further chemical modification. The methyl group at the 4 position tweaks solubility and electron density, unlocking routes unavailable to less decorated pyridines. The cyano group shapes compatibility with nucleophiles and influences the stability of intermediates made from this compound.
The compound supports production of kinase inhibitors, anti-infectives, and crop protection chemicals. The difference between a scalable route and a development dead end sometimes comes down to a single downstream reaction. We have watched teams spend weeks searching for a replacement only to come back to this material for its unique combination of chemical handles and manageable reactivity.
The physical traits do not always match the expectations a chemist forms from its molecular formula alone. As a pale yellow solid, it sometimes clumps if not dried and handled with steady airflow. Bulk customers point out that caking during transport can waste hours in their own process. Over time, we worked out an optimized drying and sieving sequence wrapped around humidty-controlled storage. This cuts out caking and makes for easier weighing and discharge, a simple but overlooked improvement if you have never personally loaded a reactor hopper with 400 kilograms of the stuff.
Specification-wise, a neutral description misses what labs on our side really watch. Every shipped lot includes spectral data, not just a standard certificate. NMR and HPLC fingerprints from both fresh and aged material show that our multi-step recrystallization routine works. Some buyers want assurance a batch will not yellow within weeks of receipt; others demand that no sulfur or transition metal residues complicate downstream catalysis. Instead of talking about “analytical grade,” we send side-by-side sample traces so they decide if our material matches their needs.
A good case study came up during a scale-up campaign for a European agricultural firm. Their patented herbicide synthesis took a serious hit every time third-party material showed more than 0.1% unidentified peaks in the HPLC trace. Workers flagged downstream filtration as a major headache—gel formation, irregular crystal habit, poor filter throughput. We agreed to work with them batch-by-batch, tuning both crystallization temperature and granule size. Instead of written guarantees, we showed the herbicide step yield at pilot scale using our lot versus industry-average material. This hands-on demonstration settled their supply decision, and gave our operators real insight into what sets excellent product apart.
Another project with a North American pharma developer highlighted the value behind the molecular features. They needed fast, reliable arylation in a Suzuki cross-coupling, and struggled with impurity build-up at the methyl group. While other methylpyridines failed to react cleanly, our lot passed through cleanly, saving two tedious workup steps. Widely quoted literature values rarely mention how subtle supply differences multiply across a full process chain; we follow up with research teams after delivery to pick up these details, feeding their knowledge back into our process.
Direct side-by-side experience with related pyridines clears the air on differences. Compared to unsubstituted 2,6-dihydroxypyridine, the methyl and cyano substituents play distinct roles. Unsubstituted variants dissolve well but often react too aggressively with certain alkylating agents, producing too many side-products. The introduction of the methyl group on the 4-position calms down this reactivity, while the nitrile position controls hydrolysis and opens doors to substitution at otherwise unreactive sites on the aromatic ring.
Some buyers ask for 2,6-dihydroxy-3,5-dimethylpyridine as an alternative, chasing minor cost differences. Even small formula tweaks lead to very different physical properties and less predictable reactivity in carbonate formation and Suzuki couplings. Years of seeing both side-by-side have proven that this compound holds a middle ground—reactive enough to enable substitution chemistry, stable enough to support demanding production schedules.
Those who have switched from general-purpose methylpyridines see the payoff most in the number of batch “saves” during late-stage filtration or crystallization. Fewer reprocessings, more predictable scale bridges from pilot to commercial, and less downtime waiting for custom specifications all add up for those under pressure to deliver on time. This knowledge comes through field reports, not just from chemical abstractions on paper.
We have seen preferences shift with changing regulations and downstream requirements. Some segments, such as diagnostics or fine pharmaceutical manufacturing, insist on material that passes both USP and ICH residual solvent guidelines. Others need very low halide levels to protect metal-catalyzed cross-coupling. Those rare requests for water content below 0.05% often signal a planned use in anhydrous synthesis or as a starting point for further purification in-house.
Rather than “tailoring” as a sales pitch, it has become clear that listening to what a customer actually plans to do with the product shapes quality far more deeply. An order destined for scale-up validation runs needs a multi-use certificate with both short-term and long-term storage data. Established production lines want full lot traceability and original analytic data from starting materials up through finished lots. That close feedback loop only forms through manufacturing, not trading; missed signals mean wasted time and reputation for everyone.
Some lessons learned came the hard way. Early in our operational experience, we underestimated the risk of static cling during pneumatic transfer, which left thin dust layers accumulating in transfer lines and filter housings. Eventually, this minor oversight caused a brief shutdown when a quality assurance inspection flagged unexplained discoloration in finished lots. Identifying the culprit required pulling apart much of the handling infrastructure, adding better humidity controls, and changing both the cleaning procedures and staff training routines. Painful but instructive—a problem only apparent in production, not in small-lab operations.
Another persistent challenge involves cross-contamination from previous production campaigns. We maintain dedicated production lines, which not only reassures users with high purity requirements but actually prevents minor impurities that can seed unwanted side-product formation. Cleaning verification now forms a routine part of every start-of-lot run; taking shortcuts to “maximize uptime” nearly always backfires with more lost batches than saved labor.
Moisture management also cannot get enough emphasis. Even at low ambient humidity, water content creeps up if storage bins or bags have any leakage. Beyond instrument calibration, team members learn the importance of rapid, protected transfer and regular monitoring down to the third decimal place. Such discipline avoids surprise spec outliers and shifts the conversation with partners from apology to shared confidence.
Sustainability shapes more of our planning as markets mature. Reducing waste solvent volumes and energy consumption means rethinking not just solvent recycling but also the reaction sequence itself. Every time we improve solvent filtration or recover a high-value intermediate, waste drops out of the process. Even small changes in crystallization solvent yield big annual reductions, making both environmental compliance and cost objectives easier to meet.
Our effluent management does not just meet local limits; it factors in downstream risks so finished lots have no unwelcome surprises. One example: regular monitoring for trace chlorinated byproducts, even though they have never appeared above reporting thresholds, reassures both regulatory agencies and buyers. Preventing a problem beats correcting it after the fact—a lesson manufacturing teaches early and often.
As more end-users move toward continuous flow and automated synthesis, even small fluctuations in material properties loom larger than ever. We now work with several industry consortia to harmonize documentation standards and reference analytical fingerprints. This cuts troubleshooting time, especially for buyers evaluating multiple sources. It also gives process engineers direct input into what specifications go beyond lab numbers and impact large-scale reliability.
Colleagues in pharmaceutical research increasingly request predictive shelf-life and storage stability data based not only on isolated lab samples but real shipments over seasons and distances. Recording this across years of production cycles builds trust and takes guesswork out of project launches. This is only possible for a manufacturer that controls the whole life cycle of the product.
From the perspective of a production chemist, the edge 2,6-dihydroxy-4-methyl-3-pyridine-carbonitrile brings is its balance—easily integrated into common process flows but robust enough to tolerate minor process upsets. Decision makers counting on month-to-month schedule certainty get confidence from years without off-spec returns. Project scientists trust in-depth analytical data for new process design and regulatory filings. Operators loading reactors value safe, dust-free handling and batch records that mean something.
Industry often chases innovation from the top but really brings progress through steady, dependable intermediates. The knowledge and repeated field trials invested in refining this compound pay forward for each new application. Every improvement in drying, sieving, packaging, or tracking leads to less rework, lower cost, and greater confidence across the supply chain.
Too often product literature lists specifications alone, hoping buyers will read between the lines. Our experience with 2,6-dihydroxy-4-methyl-3-pyridine-carbonitrile says otherwise: the details make all the difference, and the best way to ensure quality stays consistent is to talk straight about both problems encountered and solutions adopted. Responsive manufacturing keeps the unseen headaches of the past out of the critical path for new medicine, crop protection, and specialty chemical development. The value lies not in checking boxes, but in solving problems with each shipment, every time.