|
HS Code |
197352 |
| Chemical Name | 2,4-Diamino-5-methylpyridine |
| Molecular Formula | C6H9N3 |
| Molecular Weight | 123.16 g/mol |
| Cas Number | 4318-56-3 |
| Appearance | Off-white to light yellow solid |
| Melting Point | 169-172 °C |
| Solubility In Water | Slightly soluble |
| Synonyms | 2,4-Pyridinediamine, 5-methyl-; 5-Methyl-2,4-diaminopyridine |
| Smiles | CC1=CN=C(C(=N1)N)N |
| Inchi | InChI=1S/C6H9N3/c1-4-2-3-8-6(9)5(4)7/h2-3H,1H3,(H4,7,8,9) |
| Pubchem Cid | 13346 |
| Storage Conditions | Store in a cool, dry place |
As an accredited 2,4-Diamino-5-methylpyridine factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Amber glass bottle containing 25 grams of 2,4-Diamino-5-methylpyridine, sealed with a screw cap, labeled with hazard information. |
| Container Loading (20′ FCL) | Container Loading (20′ FCL) for 2,4-Diamino-5-methylpyridine involves secure, sealed packaging to prevent moisture, contamination, and comply with hazardous material regulations. |
| Shipping | 2,4-Diamino-5-methylpyridine should be shipped in tightly sealed containers, clearly labeled, and protected from physical damage. Store and transport it in a cool, dry location, segregated from incompatible substances. Shipping must comply with all local, national, and international regulations for handling laboratory chemicals, including required documentation and hazard communication standards. |
| Storage | 2,4-Diamino-5-methylpyridine should be stored in a tightly sealed container, in a cool, dry, and well-ventilated area, away from incompatible substances such as strong oxidizers and acids. Protect from light and moisture. Ensure proper labeling and keep away from sources of ignition. Use appropriate personal protective equipment when handling or transferring the chemical to avoid contact or inhalation. |
| Shelf Life | 2,4-Diamino-5-methylpyridine typically has a shelf life of 2-3 years when stored in a cool, dry, airtight container. |
|
Purity 99%: 2,4-Diamino-5-methylpyridine with 99% purity is used in pharmaceutical intermediate synthesis, where it ensures high yield and compound integrity. Melting point 162°C: 2,4-Diamino-5-methylpyridine with a melting point of 162°C is used in fine chemical manufacturing processes, where it provides consistent thermal processing stability. Molecular weight 123.15 g/mol: 2,4-Diamino-5-methylpyridine at 123.15 g/mol is used in heterocyclic compound development, where it guarantees precise stoichiometric formulation. Particle size <10 µm: 2,4-Diamino-5-methylpyridine with particle size below 10 µm is used in high-performance catalyst preparation, where it enhances reaction efficiency and surface area utilization. Stability temperature up to 140°C: 2,4-Diamino-5-methylpyridine stable up to 140°C is used in high-temperature dye synthesis, where it maintains compound integrity and consistent coloration. Water content <0.5%: 2,4-Diamino-5-methylpyridine with water content below 0.5% is used in electronic material formulations, where it prevents hydrolytic degradation and ensures material performance. |
Competitive 2,4-Diamino-5-methylpyridine prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615371019725 or mail to sales7@boxa-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: sales7@boxa-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
In the world of advanced chemical synthesis, 2,4-Diamino-5-methylpyridine stands out as a sort of unsung hero. This compound—recognized by its chemical structure, featuring a methyl group at the fifth position on the pyridine ring along with amino groups at the second and fourth positions—offers researchers and industrial chemists a reliable avenue to create new molecules with targeted properties. Knowing this molecule well, it changes the game in fields that rely on organic innovation.
At first glance, methyl substitution seems minor, yet in practice it carries real weight. The methyl group doesn’t just bulk up the structure—it shifts the chemical reactivity and physical behavior in ways that competitors such as plain 2,4-diaminopyridine seldom match. That single alteration can decide how the compound interacts with other chemicals, handles environmental factors, or responds under heating and pressure. Most research chemists appreciate how a set of well-placed atoms like this unlocks new routes for developing pharmaceuticals, colorants, and specialty polymers. Other analogs in the pyridine family don’t usually provide the same balance of reactivity and selectivity under real-lab conditions.
The qualities people look for in 2,4-Diamino-5-methylpyridine go beyond the basic purity often listed on a lab inventory. Successful synthesis hinges on both the chemical’s consistency and its behavior after shipping, repeated storage, or scaling up. Companies that supply this product tend to emphasize purity thresholds above 98%, because stray contaminants, even in tiny amounts, will ruin a carefully designed pathway or color reaction. Moisture content, physical appearance, and melting point figures aren’t just vanity metrics; they point to careful control throughout preparation. Analysts check for a melting point around 168-172°C, because deviations might signal breakdown or contamination, and they count on a finely granulated, pale yellow appearance to keep processes moving smoothly—not to meet aesthetics, but to support reaction monitoring and handling.
I remember my introduction to this compound during a medicinal chemistry project involving new ligand scaffolds for enzyme inhibitors. The compound reacted precisely and predictably in palladium-catalyzed couplings, compared to less substituted diamino analogs, which tended to give more by-products. Its performance seemed stable, and troubleshooting became a lot simpler compared to alternatives. Chemists value this reliability because wasted reagents and failed syntheses cost both money and precious time. Deploying 2,4-Diamino-5-methylpyridine as a building block supports the preparation of numerous pharmaceuticals—antimalarial drug development often includes related pyridine derivatives—and dyes for textile innovation. In these fields, research groups require small but consistent lots for pilot batches, and manufacturers pay attention to batch reproducibility because a process that stalls on the bench isn’t much use in a full-sized reactor.
Over the past decade, demand for pyridine derivatives has been pushed up by a boom in agrochemical and drug discovery sectors. Market watchers point to steady growth rates, especially in specialty intermediates such as this one. This trend likely ties back to wider adoption in custom synthesis—making one chemical to quickly link toward a larger, more complex molecule. Here, 2,4-Diamino-5-methylpyridine’s functional groups allow direct entry into a swathe of coupling, acylation, and cyclization reactions. Unlike less reactive relatives, its structure supports higher process yields and cleaner purification routes. I’ve talked to colleagues who tried switching to cheaper diaminopyridine sources, but ended up back with the methylated version when side-product headaches cost them two weeks. Time after time, the industry circles back to tried-and-true tools.
No one in the field ignores the real-world concerns around chemical sourcing and waste. Unlike large-process chemicals or commodity solvents, a compound like 2,4-Diamino-5-methylpyridine is usually handled in smaller amounts, which shrinks its overall impact. Still, safety measures count. It’s best stored tightly sealed and protected from extreme moisture, since like many small amines, it draws water from the air and can cake. Disposal routines must follow national regulations—just tossing pyridine derivatives into ordinary drains raises alarms, as their breakdown byproducts raise toxicity flags. These drawbacks aren’t unique to this specific compound, but growing pressure on chemical producers and buyers has meant more attention to purification waste streams, solvent recapture, and greener synthesis routes. Companies responding to this are winning more research contracts and supplying better documentation for users' peace of mind.
A few years ago, I worked with a group trying to improve the lightfastness of certain azo dyes for niche textile applications. Switching to intermediates based on 2,4-Diamino-5-methylpyridine made a huge difference. Standard diamino compounds broke down or yellowed after extended light exposure on physical test fabrics, while their methylated analog kept its tone, holding up over months under UV lamps. End-users—textile manufacturers—couldn’t care less about the subtlety of substituent positions, but cared a lot about uniform, durable color. Here, the choice of this compound turned technical optimization into a market win. A similar effect has shown up in some heterocyclic drug candidates: tuning the physical and biological properties by such substitutions regularly saves development time because it means fewer late-stage surprises in preclinical trials.
Competitive comparison often comes up in supplier presentations or procurement meetings. Colleagues like to weigh 2,4-Diamino-5-methylpyridine against basic 2,4-diaminopyridine, 2,6-diaminopyridine, or even tetramethylated analogs. The reason most return to this methylated variant lies in its predictability in catalysis and coupling. Added steric hindrance at the methyl position typically tweaks both the speed and site of reaction, giving chemists more fine-tuned control. For example, in copper-catalyzed cross-coupling, this selectivity keeps process yields from nosediving as with some more reactive analogs, and its lower melting point simplifies handling compared to bulkier derivatives. Rarely do chemists get “one size fits all” reagents, and it’s no exaggeration to say the right substituents at the right place can separate publishable success from hours of wasted effort.
Many researchers—myself included—have underestimated the subtle difference a single methyl group makes until the first failed reaction. My graduate supervisor once insisted we run side-by-side tests, choosing both methylated and unmethylated pyridine intermediates as a bridge to a tricky heterocycle. Only the methylated version reached expected purity in one pass through column chromatography. That small price jump in the supplier catalog justified itself tenfold in saved time and higher yield. Training new chemists using cases like these helps reinforce the value of smart reagent selection. Time spent learning how to use the best reagent pays off, both in the classroom and in the lab.
One recurring frustration across research, contract manufacturing, and scale-up is suppliers who overpromise and underdeliver. Even small differences between batches—minor color shifts, unexpected caking, or a melting point half a degree low—can stall a project. Firms adapting to customer pressures have responded by sharing independent analytical documentation, HPLC traces, and keeping closer communication with end-users. As someone who has audited both local and overseas chemical suppliers, access to real, verified batch data stands out—nothing slows progress more than having to pause a workflow for weeks while a problem batch sits on a shelf. Transparency and traceability are no longer luxuries for specialty reagents; they’ve become basic expectations, especially for academic and pharmaceutical research that rely on reproducible protocols for grant funding and regulatory reviews.
Sustainable synthesis doesn’t need to mean higher costs or less reliability. Processes for making compounds like 2,4-Diamino-5-methylpyridine continue to evolve, often replacing older, multi-step routes—fewer solvents, non-toxic reagents, and smarter catalysts drive down hazardous waste. I once visited a pilot plant trialing a new synthetic method that cut chlorinated solvent waste by half compared to older literature routes. That had two direct payoffs: easier permitting for expansion, and easier adoption by downstream industries now facing tighter waste disposal restrictions. As green chemistry continues pushing for cleaner, safer production, the compounds that lead in adoption stand to benefit most. Research grants increasingly seek out suppliers and partners who can guarantee ethics, reliability, and documentation, rather than just cut-rate pricing. My view: industry leaders in this space aren’t just chasing compliance signals but pushing practical innovation.
Quality information builds trust and enables smarter decisions. Too often, product pitches sidestep the practical realities that matter most in research settings. Emphasizing experience and evidence, not hollow marketing, helps both buyers and users cut through the noise. Providing robust, real-world performance data, independent assay results, and detailed, stepwise protocols reflects expertise and helps everyone from student researchers to seasoned process chemists. My own experience has taught me it’s better to miss an order cycle than to accept fuzzy documentation—one bad batch in circulation ripples across projects and can erode trust fast. Companies and researchers who prioritize transparency create relationships that go beyond a one-time purchase. Applying these principles consistently in sourcing, usage, and knowledge-sharing helps build a stronger global toolkit for safer, faster, and smarter chemical research.
For anyone serious about innovation in organic synthesis, pharmaceuticals, or specialty materials, 2,4-Diamino-5-methylpyridine fills a unique role. It’s not just another chemical in a catalog: its nuanced advantages—thanks to structure and purity—create opportunities others miss. From my perspective, choosing and using this compound means unlocking dependable outcomes, navigating scale-up with fewer headaches, and preparing for regulatory or process challenges with confidence. The lessons learned by experimenting, tracking supplier reliability, and troubleshooting synthesis teach that a wise investment in quality reagents pays back in saved time, cleaner results, and ultimately, greater research impact. As regulatory demands and user expectations rise, those leading in knowledge, documentation, and service will shape the next generation of specialty chemicals and applications that define success.